What the documents look like
For procurement in Franchisee onboarding, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Demonstration equipment, teaching services and opening purchases need their providers distinguished. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed franchise-training procurement packet says demonstration equipment is arranged for class, a store plans to buy operating equipment and a lecturer is responsible for explanation. A question about buying the same equipment from the lecturer lacks a sales source, confirmed model and supplying role. Citations must retain course arrangements, purchase demand and teaching responsibility separately. Using equipment in class cannot establish that the lecturer supplies it, while a classroom arrangement cannot become equipment already obtained by the store or a completed procurement event.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Procurement source check | Proposed material and scope | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Class arrangement | Equipment for demonstration | Do not turn into store procurement. |
| Demand selection | Operating equipment proposed | Check actual model relationship. |
| Lecturer role | Responsible for explanation | Do not infer supplying party. |
| Supply gap | Source and scope unconfirmed | Identify required material. |
| Store applicability | Later list may have limited scope | Check store and equipment correspondence. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, demonstration equipment may become a store purchase; inspect actual procurement and handover evidence. Second, planned operating equipment may become the classroom model; inspect selection and specification correspondence. Third, teaching responsibility may become equipment sales; inspect supplier identity and offered scope. These require transaction events, model relationships and provider roles respectively. A training manual cannot establish all three, and shared opening-related context cannot itself form a supply agreement between a lecturer and store. The evidence needs to identify the relevant object for each conclusion.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should ask what the course arranges, where store demand stands and what the lecturer service includes, tracing actual citations. Keep model and supply source unresolved without inventing an order or delivery. If references contain only the manual, inspect whether store demand and service text reached the answer; source labels alone require the actual responsibility wording checked. Later purchase lists need store and equipment applicability before use. One classroom-equipment record cannot establish a standard purchasing configuration for every franchise store merely because the training topic is common.