What the documents look like
For procurement in Franchise fee settlement, this page examines FastGPT vector indexes. Separate the deposit ledger from this purchase and inspect the supplier evidence for the current matter. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the vector indexes step
A proposed deposit-ledger note says: “Materials require a separate purchase request; this record concerns the deposit only.” An unfinished request names an opening display rack with its supplier undecided. These sources support the ledger’s purpose and the procurement object. They establish neither use of the deposit as goods payment nor a supplier appointed for the rack. Draft indexes must preserve the separate objects. Ask whether procurement is completed and whether a supplier is confirmed, tracing each answer to the relevant original.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Implementation check | Material in this test | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Ledger subject | Deposit matters only | Do not add a goods-payment purpose. |
| Purchase subject | Display-rack supplier is undecided | The ledger establishes no completed purchase. |
| Historical citation | An old request shares a store name | Check current subject and index target. |
| New confirmation | Store supplier confirmation separately | Trace its citation with the original question. |
| Image route | Inspect actual ingestion | Keep the scope statement traceable. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Embedding model | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Original data and indexes | One original data block can have multiple indexes. |
Index content | Index wording should be complete and focused. |
Image indexes | Where image retrieval is used, inspect descriptions or image vectors. |
Version and result check | After a change, reuse questions to compare originals. |
Three common errors
- If an index turns deposit matters into a purchased rack, compare the ledger, unfinished request and answer to trace the added payment purpose and completion state.
- If a historic request for a similarly named store is used here, inspect store, purchase subject and index target rather than borrowing its supplier.
- If current supplier confirmation is added but only the ledger returns, inspect new data, the current purchase target and actual candidates. Do not invent a supplier absent from the ledger.
How to verify the setup
Keep current supplier confirmation separate from the ledger and historical requests, checking store and purchase identity. Inspect the new data and actual candidates to see whether the supplier question cites this confirmation.
If only the deposit note returns, record the target and citation to locate the missing participation. Check matching models for collections associated with one search node. A retrieved passage replaces neither procurement approval nor an order record.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Franchise Fee Invoice, Deposit Ledger, Deduction Notice and Contract Payment Plan |
| Candidate sources | Financial System, Franchise Contract, Bank Statement and Store Violation Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |