What the documents look like
For procurement in On-demand retail fulfillment, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Saleable-display excerpts, store stocktakes and request corrections need their own time scope. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed instant-retail procurement packet contains a saleable display excerpt, a store stocktake awaiting location checking and a note requiring item correction in the purchase request. These are ordinary-text examples, not fields read from a real system. A question about deciding current procurement from the display lacks a completed physical check and final item. Citations must preserve source and time. One display cannot establish all usable store inventory, and an unresolved correction cannot supply the purchasing object simply because the product name appears familiar.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Procurement source check | Proposed material and scope | Evidence action |
|---|---|---|
| Display identity | Saleable excerpt | Do not treat as physical verification. |
| Location state | Checking pending | Seek actual stocktake. |
| Revision state | Item correction required | Check revised version and confirmation. |
| Current applicability | Excerpt may be older | Check current demand time. |
| Outcome boundary | Display update is not physical receipt | Inspect stage-specific evidence. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, saleable display may become a verified physical location; inspect the actual store stocktake. Second, a correction requirement may become completed revision; inspect the revised document and confirmation. Third, an older display may determine current procurement; compare excerpt time with current demand. These require physical records, document state and temporal applicability respectively. A common product name cannot replace any of them. Pending location checking also cannot establish definite inability to sell or failure of the purchase, because those outcomes require their own applicable evidence.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance should ask what the display says, what the stocktake lacks and whether the purchase item is corrected. Inspect actual citation coverage. The answer may list available wording and pending checks without real inventory or supply conclusions. If references contain only the display excerpt, inspect whether store and revision material reached the answer; a source label still needs its text read. Added material requires store, item and time matching before it can support a current stage. A display update cannot be described as actual receipt or completed purchasing.