What the documents look like
For procurement in Brand concession operations, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Counter-purchasing requests distinguish display samples, orderable goods and supplier confirmation. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A proposed supplier catalog marks one item as a display sample, leaves another supply date unanswered and includes a purchase order from a different counter. Carry counter and item identity under the real interface contract, checking the roles of Params, Headers and Body without inventing field names. Reading a catalog establishes no purchasable stock. Authentication credentials supply no brand or shopping-center purchasing authority.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Counter-purchasing HTTP | Catalog issue | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Display sample | Limited purpose | Not sale stock |
| Supply date | Unanswered | Preserve uncertainty |
| Older purchase order | Another counter | Verify identity |
| Request fields | Real contract | No invented names |
| Purchasing writes | Separate interface | Authority and receipt |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
A display sample reported as sale stock needs catalog purpose and a stock source checked. An unanswered supply date stated as fixed needs supplier wording checked. Another counter order applied here needs counter and item identity checked. These concern purpose, certainty and ownership. No real purchasing amount or completed transaction is supplied.
How to verify the setup
Inspect actual request input and whether the response contains the component asked about; retain a missing-body gap when only a summary returns. Verify item correspondence before retesting new supplier replies. Approval, order placement and stock writes need separate interfaces and authority. A successful query supports comparison only within its returned evidence. Separate display-sample labels from purchasing-availability wording, leaving missing counter correspondence explicitly open.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Concession Contract, Mall Activity Letter, Sales Receipt and Monthly Reconciliation Statement |
| Candidate sources | Mall POS, Brand ERP, Mall Member Activities and Financial System |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |