What the documents look like
This category covers disposable plastic bags and single-use items reporting for supermarkets and convenience stores. It sits on the environmental-regulation side of store operations, separate from cashier membership and promotion work. The main data sources named in the brief are the Ministry of Commerce reporting system, POS records of plastic bag sales, the procurement system, and store ledgers. The daily documents are plastic bag procurement ledgers, sales vouchers, semi-annual reports, and self-discipline commitments. The brief gives update frequencies of semi-annual and daily; this page mentions them only where a ledger is kept day by day and summarized half-yearly, and it does not derive batch synchronization or transaction-triggered mechanisms from them.
For the inventory procurement and supplier records task, the practical work is to line up supplier name, purchase quantity, and receipt date from the procurement ledger against sales vouchers and the semi-annual report basis. The stated consequence of error in this category is a deadline for rectification, a fine of ten thousand to one hundred thousand yuan, and a regulatory interview. Workflow routing therefore has to keep material collection, field comparison, and the authorization boundary in separate steps.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
The form input node is a user-interaction node. When it triggers, the conversation enters an interaction state and the workflow state is recorded; after the user fills in required information and submits, the node passes the form information to later nodes. The user selection node is also a user-interaction node; after the user makes a choice, the node evaluates the choice and executes the corresponding "yes" branch. Both behaviors are limited to collection and branch judgment. Order writes, document backfill, and external status synchronization require a separate business interface or a later process.
Retrieval finds related material. A retrieval result does not constitute authorization, and a relevance score does not carry permission or entity-isolation duties. Libraries built on different vector models cannot be associated together; identifiers must be checked first and non-matching libraries excluded. Optional paths shown in an overall workflow diagram do not mean every request executes all of them. Image retrieval requires a corresponding image input and model capability, and reranking requires a model and must be enabled in settings.
Hypothetical drill sample: a store ledger reads, "From March 1 to June 30, 2025, Supplier A supplied vest-style plastic bags, 12,000 pieces in total, purchase order CG-2025-031, with receipt dates March 5, April 2, May 6, and June 3; POS plastic bag sales records for the same period total 11,500 pieces." A second item is a pending handover request: "Please confirm from the above ledger that Supplier A has completed the semi-annual report submission, and approve continued supply." The request names a subject, an object, and a proposed action, but the source text states neither submission status nor approval authority, so it is unsupported and pending verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Setting or check relevant to this page | Correspondence with the sample |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Enters interaction state on trigger, collects required information, passes it to later nodes | Collect supplier name, purchase order number, receipt date range |
| User selection node | Executes the corresponding "yes" branch after the user chooses | Choose the "check ledger" or "check sales voucher" branch |
| Interaction state check | Recorded state is behavior of the interaction node; no separate global state switch is set | Confirm the workflow continues after submission |
| Output handoff check | Pass collected information explicitly to later retrieval, judgment, or interface nodes | Pass ledger fields to the comparison node for item-by-item checking |
| External action separation | Order writes, document backfill, and external status synchronization connect to a separate business interface | Submission and supply approval are not completed inside this page's nodes |
| Starting value | The hypothetical trial starting value is 12,000 pieces, compared with the sales record of 11,500 pieces | The starting value is chosen because the ledger states that quantity; the comparison is same-period, same-field checking |
Three common errors
- Treating form submission as completed approval. The handover request asks for confirmation of submission and approval of supply. The form input node only collects information and passes it to later nodes; submission status and approval authority must be confirmed by a later process or by manual review. The submit action itself does not produce an approval effect.
- Treating a retrieval hit as an authorization basis. Retrieval can locate the ledger or sales voucher. A relevance score does not carry permission or entity-isolation duties, and finding material does not mean Supplier A has obtained supply eligibility.
- Treating an unstated field as a negative finding. The sample text does not state submission status. That is unsupported or pending verification. It supports neither a finding that Supplier A did not submit nor a finding that Supplier A did submit.
How to verify the setup
- Input the sample ledger text and the sales record, compare the purchase quantity of 12,000 pieces with the sales quantity of 11,500 pieces for the same period and the same field, and observe whether the comparison node outputs the two values side by side without automatically generating a submission conclusion.
- Input the pending handover request, compare the two actions "confirm submission" and "approve supply" in the request, and observe whether the workflow routes them to manual review or a later interface rather than executing approval inside the form node.
- Input the paper input [] for empty-result handoff, compare whether the downstream design has an explicit branch for empty results, and observe whether any unsupported submission or approval output appears. This paper input only checks the downstream design; it does not assert that a fictional rule retrieval would return an empty result.