What the documents look like
For procurement in Trade and FX administration, this page examines FastGPT scheduled workflows. Trade-procurement source review checks actual contract-to-collection relationships. Updated registration files do not establish execution conditions for this purchase. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the scheduled workflows step
Proposed procurement files contain a trade contract and registration material, a collection record with unresolved transaction identity and an invoice lacking current correspondence. Periodic review can seek mappings without replacing transaction relationships with company names or making financial and tax judgments. Verify the real deployed trigger and read entry, retaining acquired origins. Updated registration describes changed material, not approved purchasing, processed funds or arrived goods.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Trade procurement source review | Proposed relationship | Evidence needed |
|---|---|---|
| Contract and receipt | Same entity still needs mapping | Actual transaction |
| Registration change | Updated file | Not purchase authority |
| Invoice contents | Current link unresolved | Not delivery |
| Read result | Actual passages retained | Title is not substantive review |
| Subsequent action | Purchases, funds and submission separate | Task is not completed trade |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Trigger responsibility | Inspect the available trigger and responsible component. |
Data reads | External read interfaces require explicit configuration. |
HTTP requests | Construct requests and check variables against the external contract. |
Repeated-trigger responsibility | Implement deduplication, idempotency and writes explicitly. |
Execution records | Inspect actual triggers, inputs and business responses. |
Three common errors
Entity substituted for transaction needs genuine collection correspondence. Registration promoted to authority needs actual purchasing authorization. Invoice promoted to delivery needs current receiving evidence. These inspect relationships, decisions and goods stage independently of periodic execution.
How to verify the setup
Retain passages, trigger details and real returns. Added mapping changes that explanation alone while registration and procurement states need their own sources. A changed title does not establish substantive review. Purchasing, fund actions and external submission need separate authority and receipts. Check deduplication and writes under the real system. Task output establishes neither appropriate financial action nor a completed transaction.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Foreign Exchange Receipt Slip, Trade Contract, Invoice and Foreign Exchange Business Registration Data |
| Candidate sources | State Administration of Foreign Exchange Policy, Bank Online Banking, Enterprise Financial Accounts and Customs Export Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |