What the documents look like
For procurement in Central chain procurement, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Central-purchasing requests distinguish headquarters demand, regional supply and component coverage. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A proposed headquarters demand sheet awaits approval, a supplier reply covers one region and a catalog omits supporting components. Check request method, address and parameter roles under the real contract, aligning region, item and version from earlier outputs with actual input. Inject authentication safely without equating query access with central purchasing authority. No amount or actual purchasing outcome is supplied.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Central-purchasing HTTP | Proposed gap | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters demand | Approval pending | Not formal order |
| Supply region | Specified territory | No chain-wide claim |
| Component catalog | Supporting parts absent | No complete-package claim |
| Request mapping | Region/item/version | Actual input |
| Business writes | Separate purchasing/delivery | Authority and receipt |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Pending demand reported as a formal order needs approval and ordering evidence checked. One-region supply extended across the chain needs geographic scope checked. An incomplete component catalog reported as a complete package needs component wording checked. These concern decision stage, supply scope and source coverage independently of response success.
How to verify the setup
Locate demand wording separately from supplier replies, keeping missing components beside item identity. Mark source text unreviewed when a summary alone returns. Added regional wording updates that territory alone while order state stays separate. Purchasing approval, delivery allocation and stock writes need real business procedures, interfaces, authority and receipts. The HTTP node transfers supplied data without accepting conditions for a supplier. Locate headquarters demand and regional supply separately, naming missing components and preserving the distinction between demand approval and a supplier commitment for that scope.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Centralized Procurement Contract, Replenishment Plan, Delivery Order and Store Requisition Order |
| Candidate sources | ERP Procurement, WMS, Store POS and Supplier Delivery Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |