What the documents look like
For staff training in General import declarations, this page examines FastGPT citation tracing. Trace field headings, continued excerpts and role explanations in import-document lessons. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the citation tracing step
A proposed import-document lesson contains a first-page heading for notification contact, a continuation page showing only Farvoyage Warehouse and guidance to read names with their headings. A learner explanation identifies that company as buyer, but no buyer-party page is supplied. A company name without its continued heading cannot independently establish buyer identity. Preserve the page relationship instead of merging every appearance of the same organization into all roles or filling the missing field from the learner’s interpretation rather than the actual source.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Training-source check | Teaching identity and evidence scope | Acceptance action |
|---|---|---|
| Page relationship | Heading on preceding page | Check corresponding continuation. |
| Company role | Notification contact | Do not make it buyer. |
| Learner interpretation | Separate learning output | Do not make it official document. |
| File attribution | Other exercise has same name | Check identity and page order. |
| Party-source gap | Current party page absent | Keep unresolved. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Associated knowledge bases | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Citation output | The output is an array; an empty array can continue. |
Citation input handoff | Inspect citations actually received by the answer step. |
Citation display check | Trace displayed sources to their originals. |
Document-validity check | Inspect source identity and applicable version separately. |
Three common errors
First, an unlabelled continuation may become buyer evidence; inspect its preceding page, continuation relationship and field heading instead of extracting a name alone. Second, a learner interpretation may become an official source; distinguish the explanation from the excerpt and seek the actual party field. Third, a same-named company page from another exercise may become this continuation; check exercise identity, page order and file. These require contextual restoration, source hierarchy and document attribution, without treating a visually complete citation as sufficient evidence for a role the supplied excerpt does not establish.
How to verify the setup
Ask under which heading the name belongs, what the learner added and how the pages correspond, inspecting actual received references. A continuation alone leaves role unresolved without proving contradiction or a confirmed buyer identity. An added party page still needs the same exercise checked; other same-name company material cannot complete every role. Empty references require scope and transfer investigation. The lesson compares reading relationships without changing a document party, completing an import operation or granting access merely because a field was readable in the proposed classroom material.