What the documents look like
For staff training in Franchise fee settlement, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
Franchise-settlement training can practice distinctions among contractual plans, invoices, ledger entries and bank evidence without amounts. Proposed input supplies plans and notices while lacking operation receipts. The form passes passages and parties to explanation without reconciling accounts. Answers remain within the supplied wording; an issued invoice is not received payment, and a sent notice is not executed deduction.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Training check | Proposed input | Observable evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Term distinction | Plan, invoice and bank evidence | Invoice does not become receipt |
| Notice boundary | Notice without execution record | Deduction is not presumed |
| Voucher destination | Source choice receives notice heading | Inspect values and retain the gap |
| Party mismatch | Another store’s ledger introduced | Inspect contractual identity and remove it |
| Financial authority | Separate handling and settlement procedure | Training choice does not replace permission |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
Test choices to obtain a corresponding voucher or read the contract only. If the voucher route receives only a notice heading, inspect actual transferred values and retain the execution gap. Another store’s ledger also needs party and source checks before removal. Downstream continuation does not establish approved accounting relationships, and a learner’s selection does not replace financial authority. If invoice wording recording issuance becomes received funds, inspect that statement separately from this party’s bank evidence. An invoice supplies no receipt event; remove the financial conclusion while its evidence is absent.
How to verify the setup
Retain parties, source meanings and answer origins. Repeat with corresponding business records and inspect the distinction between plans and execution. Interaction state follows the node, without a global switch declaring financial review complete. Actual deductions, accounting changes or settlement confirmation need separate procedures, authority and real receipts. Training completion establishes neither completed settlement nor a determination of contractual validity or justified handling.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Franchise Fee Invoice, Deposit Ledger, Deduction Notice and Contract Payment Plan |
| Candidate sources | Financial System, Franchise Contract, Bank Statement and Store Violation Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |