What the documents look like
For staff training in Regional dealer stock, this page examines FastGPT shared access. Test a training share with proposed replenishment and collection exercises, inspecting source meaning and isolation of actual customer resources. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the shared access step
Training can propose dealer requests, collection plans and stock wording so learners identify demand, arrangements and definitions without actual customers or amounts. Inspect the classroom version through the complete link, then request restricted dealer sources. Plans and inventory wording support explanation without order acceptance or funds receipts. Matching contact text establishes no authority. Inventory meaning also differs from present availability. Sharing an exercise and approving business are separate steps, so retain the limits of each source rather than expanding a learner’s answer.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Dealer-training share | Exercise and actual sources | Actual verification |
|---|---|---|
| Classroom material | Requests, plans and inventory definitions | Version and gaps |
| Customer restriction | Exclude collection and credit | Full response and denial |
| Across browsers | Prior customer and stock meaning | Obtain absent exercise |
| Judgment scope | Understanding proves no acceptance, funds or authority | Limits and actual outcome |
| Record action | Answers submit nothing or record scores | Separate business and learning checks |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Login-free window | Copy the complete generated sharing link. |
Expiry and QPM | QPM is the per-user requests-per-minute limit. |
Credit limit | Inspect usage and charging conditions by entry and edition. |
Identity verification | Third-party authentication has commercial-edition restrictions. |
Conversation-history boundary | Anonymous identity depends on the same device and browser. |
Three common errors
- If an exercise returns actual customer collection or internal credit, retain passages and full answers. Renaming examples establishes no operational isolation.
- If another browser asks about prior replenishment without customer and stock definitions, inspect history and obtain the question. Anonymous identity cannot automatically substitute older stock.
- If understanding requests and plans becomes accepted orders, received funds or learner approval rights, compare classroom limits and actual outcomes. Answering executes no business or member grant.
How to verify the setup
Ask about initial exercises, revised stock definitions and restricted customer sources separately, recording versions, passages and denials. Supplied definitions omitted from input need transmission checks; absent originals remain missing, and renewal supplies no availability. Verify classroom identity conditions under actual capability without treating entry credentials as dealer approval authority. Solving submits no replenishment, records no collection and automatically writes no score. Business and learning records need separate execution evidence rather than missing sources being generated from training performance.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Replenishment Request, Inventory Turnover Sheet, Outbound Order and Payment Collection Plan |
| Candidate sources | Dealer ERP, Brand Ordering System, Warehouse Inventory and Sales Collection |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |