What the documents look like
Store cold-chain receiving produces four recurring documents: cold-chain temperature records, arrival acceptance sheets, rejection notes, and supplier delivery notes. These materials are generated per batch and per day. The operational parties are fresh-warehouse distribution, store receiving, and quality inspection staff. For store service and internal training, the fields and handover requirements in those documents must be turned into checkable inputs, then handed to interactive nodes in a workflow so the values can be collected and passed onward.
The Form Input node is a user-interaction node. When it is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state, the workflow state is recorded, and after the user fills the required information and submits, the node collects the submitted form information and passes it to later nodes. The User Selection node is also a user-interaction node. It enters the interactive state, records the workflow state, and after the user makes a choice, the node evaluates that choice and executes the corresponding branch. These two node behaviours determine how training material and store service requests are received: a person first arranges document content into fields to be filled, the interactive node collects them, and later retrieval or judgement nodes carry the output forward.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
The constraints follow from the division of labour between documents and nodes. Form Input and User Selection collect and pass information. Order writing, document backfill, and external status synchronization require a separate business interface or a later process. Retrieval results and relevance scores do not constitute an authorization decision and do not perform subject, store, or permission filtering. Empty-result handling can be checked against an explicit paper input of [] to inspect the downstream design; no rule is inferred about what a fictional retrieval would return.
Libraries built on different vector models cannot be associated together. The identifier must be checked first and non-matching libraries excluded, with the actual observation recorded. The optional paths shown in a general workflow diagram do not mean every request executes all of them. Image retrieval requires a corresponding image input and model capability. Reranking requires a model and must be enabled according to its settings.
Configuration and implementation checks
The table below covers this page's sample and lists only documented settings or implementation checks relevant to workflow routing and store service and internal training.
| Configuration item | Hypothetical trial starting point for this case | Reason for the choice and comparison method |
|---|---|---|
| Required fields on the Form Input node | Batch number, arrival date, temperature reading | Compare item by item against the fields on the arrival acceptance sheet; if one is missing, do not submit |
| Branches on the User Selection node | Accept and reject | Compare against whether a rejection note exists, and confirm the branch connections are correct |
| Interactive state check | Workflow state is recorded after triggering | Compare against the node documentation; no separate global state switch is set |
| Output handover check | Submitted information is passed to a later retrieval or judgement node | Compare output fields against input fields one by one |
| External action division | Order writing and external synchronization connect to a separate interface | Compare against the node documentation and confirm no business action is written into the interactive node |
Three common errors
- Treating a retrieval result or relevance score as an authorization basis. The input is the returned retrieval record; the comparison object is the store and subject authorization scope; the observable result is that a mismatch between the two is still treated as executable. The check is to verify the authorization identifier and record the gap when it is missing.
- Treating the collection behaviour of an interactive node as business execution. The input is the submitted form content; the comparison object is whether order writing or external synchronization occurred; the observable result is that a submission with no downstream interface is still described as completed. The check is to inspect the downstream node connections.
- Writing a pending-review or pending-submission state as already approved. The input is the status field of the handover request; the comparison object is the approval record; the observable result is that a pending-review marker alone is written as already effective. The check is to verify whether the approval field, the signature, and the effective date exist as three separate facts.
How to verify the setup
Hypothetical drill sample: the source material reads "On 12 March 2026, batch A-0312 arrived by cold-chain vehicle; the temperature record shows 4°C; the arrival acceptance sheet awaits the quality inspector's signature; no rejection note has been issued." The draft sentence to be judged is "This batch has completed acceptance and been released."
- Verification one: input the source material above and the draft sentence; compare "has completed acceptance and been released" in the draft against "the arrival acceptance sheet awaits the quality inspector's signature" in the source; the observable result is that the draft sentence is unsupported and must remain pending verification.
- Verification two: input the source material above; compare whether a rejection note exists against the branch connections of the User Selection node; the observable result is that when no rejection note has been issued, the accept path can still be taken, so the branch conditions must be checked against the material status.
- Verification three: input the paper empty result [] and the downstream design; compare whether the downstream handles it as an empty result; the observable result meets the condition when the downstream does not treat the empty result as a matched record. The retrieval check records only the observation and the failure branch; it does not guarantee a first hit or full recall.