What the documents look like
For staff training in Livestream sample inspections, this page examines FastGPT interactive forms. Sample-inspection teaching separates report subjects, observation completion and selection status. Collected form input replaces neither actual inspection nor selection decisions. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the interactive forms step
A proposed exercise leaves sample observation unfinished, identifies another inspected specimen in the report and keeps selection opinions as a draft. Collect sample relationships and passages. A person may obtain identity mapping or review observation records. Shared product names cannot join reports, and incomplete observation supplies no final finding. Pass these limits into subsequent teaching input instead of inferring passed inspection or permission to purchase from submission.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Sample-teaching form | Proposed source state | Evidence needed |
|---|---|---|
| Observation | Unfinished | Not a final finding |
| Report subject | Another specimen | Current-item mapping |
| Selection opinion | Draft | Not approval |
| Subsequent input | Limits and identity retained | Inspect actual receipt |
| Real business | Inspection and purchasing separate | Submission does not assess competence |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input | Collect input and pass values after submission. |
Required-information check | Design required business inputs and missing-input handling. |
User selection | The selected option maps to a connected branch. |
Interaction state | Inspect waiting and completed interaction separately. |
Downstream responsibility | Verify validation, approval and write results separately. |
Three common errors
Report applied to another sample needs inspected identity and origin. Unfinished observation promoted to a finding needs actual completion records. Selection draft promoted to approval needs the real decision. These inspect subject, observation stage and decision independently of a choice leading to another step.
How to verify the setup
Compare sample identities submitted and actually received. Added mapping changes report correspondence alone while observation and selection remain unresolved. Reorganized drafts do not change approval status. Real inspection, purchasing and listing decisions need separate authority and receipts. Waiting and continuation establish neither sample quality, evaluated staff competence nor completed selection in practice.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Sample Evaluation Form, Quality Inspection Report, Supplier Qualifications and Prohibited Sales List |
| Candidate sources | Supplier Information, Testing Agency Report, Platform Negative Catalog and Historical Return Rate |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |