What the documents look like
Community group-buy presale collection reverses the usual retail order: orders are gathered first, then purchasing and fulfillment are organized around the collected result. Store service and internal training for this category handle four recurring documents: the presale product table, the collection result, the purchasing plan, and the cut-off notice. These materials update daily or per session, and handovers between store staff and operations frequently involve versions that do not match the current collection batch.
The interactive forms step relies on two documented node types. The form input node is a user interaction node. When it is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state, the workflow state is recorded, and execution waits until the user completes the interaction. After the user fills the required information and submits, the node collects the submitted form information and passes it to later nodes. The user selection node is also a user interaction node. It enters the same interaction state, records the workflow state, waits for the user to complete the interaction, and then evaluates the user's choice and executes the corresponding branch. Neither node includes a business database function. Field validation, approval, write-back, and batch operations require an external system or later nodes.
Constraints at the interactive forms step
Store service and internal training must separate four kinds of action: behavior the node already has, fields that can actually be configured, manual verification steps, and business actions that need a separate system. The form input node collects information the user fills in. A retrieval result or a form submission does not constitute authorized execution.
A hypothetical drill sample follows. Source text one: "April 12 cut-off notice (session 0412): this session's presale product table lists 12 items, the cut-off time is April 12 at 18:00, and the collection result is based on the order summary after submission." Source text two: "Store training handover sheet: shortage items reported by the group leader must be entered in the remarks column of the presale product table before cut-off; the purchasing plan is prepared by supply chain scheduling after cut-off based on the collection result." Draft sentence to be assessed: "During store training, the shortage remarks submitted by the group leader before cut-off have completed the purchasing plan adjustment." The draft sentence has the group leader as subject, the shortage remark as object, submission as the state, and the completed purchasing plan adjustment as the fact to be judged. According to the source text, the purchasing plan is prepared by supply chain scheduling after cut-off based on the collection result. The group leader's remark submission and the purchasing plan adjustment involve different subjects and different stages. The draft sentence presents submission as completed adjustment, which the source text does not support.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Relevant setting or check on this page | Relation to the sample |
|---|---|---|
| Form input node | Enters interaction state when triggered, records workflow state, waits for interaction | Used to collect the group leader's shortage remark; submitted information passes to later nodes |
| Required information check | List fields that cannot be missing; test the missing case and the completed case separately | Check whether the remark contains session, product, and quantity |
| User selection node | Executes a branch according to the user's choice | Used to confirm the session the remark belongs to; does not serve as a personnel directory |
| Interaction state wait | Continues downward after the interaction completes | Remark submission does not automatically trigger the purchasing plan |
| Downstream processing split | Field validation, approval, and write-back are implemented in an external system as needed | Purchasing plan adjustment needs a separate system and is not written into the form node |
This page does not specify numeric default values. Hypothetical trial starting point: set the session 0412 cut-off time to April 12 at 18:00. The reason for this choice is that the source text already states that time. The comparison method is to check whether the form submission time is earlier than that time.
Three common errors
- Treating form submission as a completed purchasing plan adjustment. Input: the group leader's shortage remark submission record. Comparison: the source text states the purchasing plan is prepared by supply chain scheduling after cut-off. Observable result: after the remark is submitted, the purchasing plan field remains empty.
- Treating the user selection node as a personnel directory or business data selector. Input: the user selection branch configuration. Comparison: the node documentation states only that a branch executes according to the user's choice. Observable result: the branch result contains no personnel identity or permission information.
- Treating a retrieval result or similarity setting as an authorization filter. Input: records returned by retrieval. Comparison: the source text separates cut-off and purchasing plan by subject and stage. Observable result: a retrieval hit does not change the business state of the record.
How to verify the setup
- Input source text one and the draft sentence. Compare the subject of the draft sentence with the subject in the source text. Observable result: the draft sentence presents the group leader's submission as a completed purchasing plan adjustment, which does not match the source subject, so it is judged unsupported.
- Input source text two and the store training handover request. Compare the operating subject in the request with the authorized subject in the source text. Observable result: the training handover sheet does not state authorization for purchasing plan adjustment, so the request remains pending verification.
- Input an empty-result downstream scenario using the paper input []. Check the downstream design against that input. Compare whether the downstream node explicitly handles empty input. Observable result: when empty input handling is undefined, record it as a gap. Retrieval checks record observations and failure branches only; they do not guarantee a first hit or full recall.