What the documents look like
For staff training in Central chain procurement, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Train on substitute proposals, tote returns and packaging units without approving substitution or allocation. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
This page invents a distribution lesson: a headquarters substitute comparison is for discussion, a shortage note retains the original variant, and allocation wording proposes a substitute pending store confirmation. Another record concerns returned reusable totes only. Learners submit the passages and choose substitution scope or container-versus-goods review. Downstream input should retain pending confirmation. Headquarters discussion replaces no store agreement, and tote return establishes no goods receipt. No real allocation quantity or order is supplied, and no carton/item conversion is calculated.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Distribution-lesson routing | Invented restriction | Learning check |
|---|---|---|
| Substitute comparison | Headquarters discussion | Not store acceptance |
| Shortage variant | Original unchanged | Match confirmed proposal |
| Reusable tote | Container returned only | Not goods receipt |
| Packaging units | Conversion support absent | No automatic conversion |
| Lesson routes | Variant or object review | No actual allocation |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
- If a discussed substitute becomes store acceptance, compare comparison purpose, original shortage variant and explicit confirmation. Choosing a route makes no substitution decision.
- If tote return becomes completed store receipt, inspect record subject, container handoff and goods acknowledgment separately.
- If headquarters carton wording becomes available store items, inspect units and actual conversion support. Missing packaging instructions cannot be filled through a shared product name.
How to verify the setup
Use fixed lesson material on both routes, comparing submitted and received variants, objects and units. Ask learners to identify missing evidence. Added store confirmation updates the same proposed substitute only; containers and goods retain separate states. Label material as practice without requesting real allocation. Substitution, order changes and stock writes require business approval, interfaces and receipts. Waiting and continuation record interaction without authenticating a store, certifying learning or transferring stock.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Centralized Procurement Contract, Replenishment Plan, Delivery Order and Store Requisition Order |
| Candidate sources | ERP Procurement, WMS, Store POS and Supplier Delivery Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |