What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Franchisee onboarding, this page examines FastGPT conversation logs. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the conversation logs step
An onboarding log review can establish whether a conversation only explained an SOP or actually received store assessment and opening material. Proposed evidence contains attendance and handbook discussion without assessment execution or site checks. chatId locates the exchange without establishing competence or a completed business checklist. Inspect actual inputs and returns rather than assuming assessment fields or the entire training history were retained.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Object | Proposed record | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Learning scope | Attendance and handbook explanation | No direct competence conclusion |
| Version mixing | Earlier handbook exchange enters current review | Inspect identity, version and source |
| Assessment gap | No actual assessment record returned | detail does not establish passing |
| Testing distinction | Test answer separate from formal assessment | Inspect identities and histories separately |
| Business approval | Separate opening recognition and retention | Log is not headquarters approval |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Conversation identity | Associate the target conversation with source identities. |
Run details | Inspect runtime details against the interface contract. |
Field meanings | Use the fields actually returned. |
Debug and production calls | Inspect input differences between test and actual calls. |
Business-audit responsibility | Implement reconciliation and retention in the broader solution. |
Three common errors
An earlier handbook conversation mixed into current training requires identity, version and source checks. A recent answer does not establish applicability. If responseData contains no assessment record, it cannot prove a pass. Request detail under the official contract and inspect the return, obtaining business evidence separately. Testing identity differences must not turn a test answer into formal staff assessment.
How to verify the setup
Retain store, hypothetical learner identity, handbook version and assessment gap, comparing production and testing histories, inputs and returns. Reinspect explanation after business material arrives without declaring completion from record existence. Opening approval, recognition, profile writes and retention need the complete procedure. This log review establishes available exchange evidence rather than approved opening or audited training quality.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Training Attendance Sheet, Opening Checklist, SOP Manual and Assessment Scores |
| Candidate sources | Training System, Supervisor APP, Store Photos and Headquarters SOP Library |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |