What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Franchise fee settlement, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A franchise-settlement review can distinguish contractual payment plans, invoices, deposit ledgers and deduction notices without numerical amounts. Proposed inputs describe an issued invoice and a notice lacking corresponding bank evidence. Issuing an invoice does not establish receipt, and a notice does not establish executed deduction. Describe a reading tool as locating supplied entries and gaps, retaining parties and origins without assuming a connected financial system.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Review step | Proposed material | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| State distinction | Plan, invoice and bank source separated | Invoice is not receipt |
| Notice scope | Deduction notice without execution evidence | Not rewritten as completed deduction |
| Party mismatch | Another store’s ledger enters the contract | Inspect identity and actual citations |
| Unsourced value | Bank-source name without its record | Obtain the corresponding document |
| Financial handling | Separate accounting change or confirmation | Organization is not completed approval |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
A ledger from another store cannot support this contract’s conclusion. Inspect contractual identity, ledger subject and returned citations. Another failure populates required bank evidence with an unsourced document name. Trace submitted material and obtain the corresponding record; a value is not a supplied voucher. Deduction wording replaces neither execution nor a bank result, and textual differences do not determine whether a deduction is justified.
How to verify the setup
Retain plans, notices, accounting entries and bank evidence separately, inspecting actual invocation and supporting passages before and after corresponding records arrive. Start with a small tool set. Missing suitable required inputs may prevent a call, without promising automatic supplementation. Termination prevents another AI summary. Accounting changes, deductions and reconciliation confirmation require separate authority and receipts; organizing text establishes neither completed settlement nor financial approval.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Franchise Fee Invoice, Deposit Ledger, Deduction Notice and Contract Payment Plan |
| Candidate sources | Financial System, Franchise Contract, Bank Statement and Store Violation Records |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |