What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Regional dealer stock, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A regional-dealer stock review can list replenishment requests, turnover wording, dispatch records and collection plans separately. Proposed material contains a request and plan without actual dispatch evidence. A reading tool should describe supplied entries and relationships, without inferring calculation definitions from a turnover-sheet title. Retain dealer, item and period identities; shared product names do not establish combinable warehouse stock, and automatic metric calculation is not presumed.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Review step | Proposed material | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Demand and execution | Request present; dispatch evidence absent | Not rewritten as shipped |
| Calculation boundary | Turnover source provides scope only | No guessed metric or automatic calculation |
| Plan misuse | Collection plan used as receipt record | Trace source status and citation |
| Source substitution | Dispatch input contains request heading | Inspect actual input and obtain the passage |
| Business confirmation | Separate stock adjustment or reconciliation | Reading does not replace verification |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Treating a collection plan as actual receipt misstates execution. Inspect source status, parameter origins and returned citations, obtaining business records before interpretation. A required dispatch source replaced by a request heading may leave unsuitable input. Check actual invocation and received content rather than assuming completeness from a nonempty title. Another dealer’s stock material cannot fill this subject’s source gap.
How to verify the setup
Inspect demand, stock wording, dispatch execution and collection evidence separately. Repeat after corresponding dealer and item records arrive, tracing each judgment to a passage. Start with a small connected tool set; descriptions do not establish execution. Termination ends this call without a subsequent AI summary. Replenishment submission, stock adjustment and financial reconciliation require independent authority and actual receipts; reading establishes neither verified metrics nor completed business handling.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Replenishment Request, Inventory Turnover Sheet, Outbound Order and Payment Collection Plan |
| Candidate sources | Dealer ERP, Brand Ordering System, Warehouse Inventory and Sales Collection |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |