What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Brand member operations, this page examines FastGPT tool calls. Compare the material received with the sources used in the answer. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the tool calls step
A member-operations review can inspect the scope of tag descriptions, engagement plans, coupon rules and authorization material. Proposed inputs supply plans and rule passages without actual contact or usage results. A plan does not establish receipt by members. Limit a reading tool to general material without sending real member data. Retain activity and source scope; a tag name does not establish permission to send, and configured coupons do not establish redemption.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Review step | Proposed material | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Plan boundary | Engagement arrangement distinct from contact | Plan does not establish sending |
| Unsourced permission | Authorized value without source material | Inspect request and retain the gap |
| Activity identity | Usage material from another activity | Does not fill this outcome gap |
| Public scope | General rules and proposed text only | No real member data used |
| Business execution | Sending, tagging or coupon operation | Separate permission and real receipt |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Tool description | Describe purpose, inputs and non-applicable situations. |
Tool parameters | Inspect module and plugin parameters separately. |
Required parameters | The model may not invoke a tool without suitable required inputs. |
Tool connections | Available tools must connect to the calling module. |
Tool-call termination | Termination ends the call without a later AI summary. |
Three common errors
Treating planned recipients as actually contacted subjects exceeds the evidence. Inspect source status and citations. A required authorization input saying authorized without a source still lacks support; inspect the real request and supplied records rather than accepting its value as permission. Another activity’s usage wording also cannot fill this activity’s outcome gap. Establish activity identity before interpreting differences.
How to verify the setup
Retain arrangements, rules, absent authorization evidence and actual outcomes separately. Inspect invocation, input scope and returned origins, repeating after general supporting material is supplied without using real personal records publicly. Start with a small tool set; termination ends the current call without another AI summary. Sending, tag writes or coupon handling require separate authority and receipts. Reading establishes neither campaign execution, effects nor completed permission checks.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Member Tagging Sheet, Engagement Plan, Coupon Rules and Privacy Authorization Records |
| Candidate sources | CRM System, WeCom, POS Consumption Records and Mini Program Behavior Data |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |