What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Fresh-food supplier claims, this page examines FastGPT HTTP integrations. Cite document receipt, supplier position and execution separately in claim review. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the HTTP integrations step
A hypothetical query body records measurement documents received while the supplier’s opinion is pending. An attachment list names current-batch photographs without a handling outcome. Inspect batch, speaker and actual readable attachments when connecting a real source. A listed name does not establish complete returned image content. Document receipt is not acceptance of liability, and an awaited opinion does not establish refusal. Organize current evidence and gaps without importing another matter’s outcome.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Claim-report read | Proposed record | Inspection |
|---|---|---|
| Document receipt | Measurements received | Not liability acceptance |
| Supplier opinion | Reply pending | Infer no refusal |
| Attachment list | Photo names for this batch | Inspect actual content |
| History | Another batch’s outcome | Do not transfer |
| Execution | Separate authority/receipt | Read does not close |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Request address and method | The request address and method follow the external contract. |
Params and Headers | Inspect parameters, headers and authentication separately. |
| Body | Where a JSON body is used, validate its structure against the external contract. |
Variable references | Variables can come from global, system or upstream outputs. |
Debug identity fields | Test mode lacks chatId and responseChatItemId. |
Three common errors
Receipt promoted to acceptance needs the supplier’s original reply. An attachment listing promoted to full content needs the actual response inspected. An older outcome used here needs batch and matter identity checked. These concern meaning, coverage and subject, independent of parseability.
How to verify the setup
Compare contracted response type, raw body and citations; retain the gap if an attachment was not returned. A new opinion updates its corresponding matter only. Verify authentication, material access and claim-handling authority separately. A read sends no claim or closure; execution requires actual business evidence.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Quality Anomaly Form, Photo Evidence, Deduction Notice and Claim Reconciliation Statement |
| Candidate sources | Quality Inspection System, WMS Acceptance, Supplier Contract and Financial Reconciliation |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |