What the documents look like
Sample inspection for livestream selling happens before a broadcast goes live. The decision under review is whether a product can be sold and whether it can be presented on camera without a compliance problem. The working materials are sample evaluation sheets, quality inspection reports, supplier qualification files and prohibited-item lists. These come from supplier submissions, testing-agency reports, platform negative catalogs and historical return rates. The typical roles are selection managers, supply-chain business development staff and quality inspection specialists. A mistake at this stage produces returns after a failed broadcast, a finding of false advertising, or a platform penalty. Materials are updated weekly and per item, so the daily reconciliation load is substantial. For conversation logs and audit, the question is how these materials are cited inside a session and how the session is recorded.
The audit object is the conversation itself, not the inspection conclusion. A session is identified by chatId and a single exchange is identified by dataId. Run detail is obtained through the chat interface's detail parameter. When detail is false, only the final answer is returned. When detail is true, intermediate values and complete results appear in responseData, and in stream mode they are separated by event. The documentation states that actual consumed Token values are not returned; when those are needed, detail must be set to true and the tokens inside responseData calculated manually. The presence of a log does not mean a compliance audit has been completed. Reconciliation, retention and compliance requirements are carried out separately by a complete business solution.
Constraints at the conversation logs step
A session is located by chatId, which must be kept unique and shorter than 250 characters. A single exchange is located by dataId. Run detail for one exchange is retrieved by passing appId, chatId and dataId together. If these identifiers are mixed up, the returned record belongs to a different exchange and any comparison drawn from it is invalid. The detail flag changes what is observable: with detail false the intermediate module state and the complete result are absent from the response, so a review that needs module-level evidence cannot rely on that response. In stream mode the intermediate values arrive under event names, and the flowResponses event carries the complete node response. The documentation notes that responses from different modules and different versions may differ in their concrete values, so the latest values should be inspected directly.
A hypothetical paper exercise sample is set out here. The material submitted for comparison is a sample evaluation sheet whose text reads: "Sample number SP-0417, supplier Example Supply Chain Company, evaluation conclusion pending re-inspection, evaluation date 17 April 2025." The same session contains a draft handover sentence: "This sample has passed quality inspection and can be scheduled for broadcast." The source material states only that the conclusion is pending re-inspection; no passing conclusion appears anywhere in the source text. The draft sentence and the source material take mutually exclusive values on the conclusion field, so the draft sentence is unsupported. The pending re-inspection status does not show that broadcast scheduling authority is absent, and it does not show that quality inspection has passed.
Retrieval and form collection do not constitute authorization. A pending review does not show that operating authority is missing. A similarity score does not perform a permission or entity-isolation function. Libraries built on different vector models cannot be associated together; identifiers are checked first and non-conforming items are excluded. An empty result can be checked against a downstream design using an explicit paper input, without claiming that a fictional rule search necessarily returns empty.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Configuration item | Type | Use on this page |
|---|---|---|
| appId | Application identifier | Confirm which application a session belongs to, so sessions are not combined across applications |
| chatId | Session identifier | Locate the target session; must remain unique and shorter than 250 characters |
| dataId | Exchange identifier | Locate the specific exchange record used for run-detail checks |
| detail | Boolean | Set to true when intermediate values are needed, then inspect responseData |
| stream | Boolean | Determines how events separate intermediate values and which read path applies |
| loadCustomFeedbacks | Boolean | When listing exchanges, determines whether custom feedback is read |
These are all fields described in the documentation. This page specifies no default values and sets no global switches. Where a numeric starting point is needed for a comparison, it is named as a hypothetical exercise starting value with its reason, and is never described as an official default. The documentation states that the model and temperature fields passed in a request have no effect because the orchestration decides them. The documentation also states that the interface does not return actual consumed Token values, so any Token figure used in a reconciliation must be calculated manually from responseData. Retrieval is not authorization; business verification, approval, database writes and external synchronization require their own stated downstream implementation.
Three common errors
- Treating a detail=false response as a complete run record. With detail false, only the final answer is returned and intermediate module state and complete results do not appear. Executable check: for the same chatId and dataId in the sample, send one request with detail=false and one with detail=true, then compare whether responseData appears in each response. Absence of responseData in the first response means the intermediate values were not obtained.
- Using chatId and dataId interchangeably. chatId identifies a session and dataId identifies a single exchange. Executable check: call the single-exchange run-detail endpoint with the sample chatId and the sample dataId, then compare whether the returned record corresponds to the same exchange. A mismatch means the identifiers were confused.
- Reading pending re-inspection as passed. The sample source material states the conclusion is pending re-inspection, while the draft handover sentence states it has passed. Executable check: compare the draft sentence against the source material conclusion field word by word. Mutually exclusive values on the same field mean the draft sentence is unsupported; this is not classified as a negation or a conflict.
How to verify the setup
- Input the sample chatId and dataId, request run detail with detail=true, and compare whether the response contains responseData and the corresponding node records. Appearance of the matching records satisfies the read condition. If they do not appear, record the gap and do not infer a cause.
- Input the sample source text and the draft handover sentence, and compare the conclusion field values. The source states pending re-inspection and the draft states passed, which are mutually exclusive values on the same field, and the draft is judged unsupported.
- Input an exchange-list request for the same chatId and compare whether the returned dataId matches the sample. A match means the exchange was located correctly. A mismatch is recorded as an identifier discrepancy and no further judgment is performed.
For any retrieval check, record what was observed and note the failure branch rather than asserting that the first result always matches, that all relevant items are recalled, or that an unrelated query necessarily returns empty. Do not run a cross-model retrieval to compare missed recalls; check the identifiers, exclude non-conforming items and record the actual observation. The optional paths shown in the overall flow diagram do not mean every request executes all of them: image retrieval requires a corresponding image input and model capability, and reranking requires a model and must be enabled by configuration. Where the documentation does not state an error code or an actual observation, describe what to compare and leave the rest unknown.