What the documents look like
For operating reviews in Group-buy presale orders, this page examines FastGPT workflow routing. Pre-sale reporting distinguishes registration, consolidation and supplier confirmation. The workflow preserves cut-off coverage separately from actually confirmed demand. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the workflow routing step
A proposed review says demand was consolidated, procurement awaits confirmation and added fruit was absent from the original cut-off notice. Collect these passages. A person can inspect the addition’s coverage or obtain supplier confirmation without promoting consolidation to fulfillment. For this pre-sale round, pass the corresponding notice and list together. A completed earlier round does not establish the current state, and an existing plan does not establish supplier acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Pre-sale review workflow | Proposed excerpt | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Demand consolidation | Merged | Not confirmed supply |
| Procurement plan | Handling pending | Actual supplier reply |
| Fruit addition | Outside original notice | Unresolved coverage retained |
| Pre-sale round | Current separate from prior | Source-event ownership |
| Outcome update | One source added | Not every state changed |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Form input node | Submitted form values pass to subsequent steps. |
User-selection node | Execution follows the connected selected branch. |
Interaction-state check | Inspect waiting and post-submission states. |
Output handoff check | Compare values passed between steps. |
External-operation responsibility | External business operations require an implementation. |
Three common errors
Consolidation promoted to confirmation needs the actual supplier reply. An addition’s unresolved status erased from the report requires notice and input comparison. A prior-round outcome used here needs source-event and received-text checks. These inspect supplier position, coverage differences and event identity rather than infer from a finished report.
How to verify the setup
Pass addition review and supplier collection to their respective recipients. Adding this round’s fruit explanation changes coverage without confirming supply. A supplier acknowledging demand receipt still leaves handling pending. Purchasing, customer notices and reserved stock need actual records in separate steps. Output establishes neither executed pre-sale handling nor conversion performance; keep unknown states instead of filling them with earlier material.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Pre-Sale Product List, Consolidated Order Results, Procurement Plan and Order Cut-off Notice |
| Candidate sources | Mini Program Orders, Supplier Inventory, Group Leader Feedback and Warehouse and Distribution Route Planning |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |