What the documents look like
For multilingual work in Franchisee onboarding, this page examines FastGPT vector indexes. New-store preparation indexes need proposed opening separated from premises handover, preserving actors and conditions. The examples are hypothetical.
Constraints at the vector indexes step
Proposed new-store plans place display setup after premises handover. The English summary says display setup proposed after premises handover, and no handover record is supplied. A question about whether the store is open cannot be answered by that plan: neither handover nor completed setup is documented. An opened-store index would skip the prerequisite, action and operating state. Ask separately about the handover condition and proposed work, checking the original’s supported stage rather than treating an opening-related heading as evidence of actual operation at the site.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Material check | Conditions in this test | Implementation evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Action prerequisite | After handover | Inspect condition scope. |
| Planned stage | Proposed | Do not report completion. |
| Participants | Property party and store | Check actions separately. |
| Completion material | Current-store execution | Do not fill from title. |
| Operating question | Independent evidence absent | Do not infer that the store does not exist. |
Documented conditions
| Documented item / implementation check | Condition |
|---|---|
Embedding model | Knowledge bases associated with one search node must use the same embedding model. |
Original data and indexes | One original data block can have multiple indexes. |
Index content | Index wording should be complete and focused. |
Image indexes | Where image retrieval is used, inspect descriptions or image vectors. |
Version and result check | After a change, reuse questions to compare originals. |
Three common errors
First, an index may omit after; compare Chinese after handover and the English condition scope, preserving sequence. Second, an answer may change proposed into completed; trace plan verbs and seek execution evidence for this store instead of filling completion. Third, property handover and store opening may merge into one actor; inspect who hands over what and who proposes setup rather than construct operating status from a shared address. These concern prerequisite, stage and participant. Preparation documents establish no real eligibility or permission to open a store merely through their name.
How to verify the setup
Ask for handover evidence, whether setup is planned or observed and the source for operating status, comparing returned indexes with originals. Several questions mapped to one plan add no completion evidence. Check the same-model condition for multiple bases within a retrieval node separately. This exercise arranges no fit-out, announces no opening and decides no actual permission. An absent handover record does not establish that handover failed to occur, while failure to retrieve operating material does not establish that the store does not exist. Later sources need store and time checks before revision.
| Material context | Scope |
|---|---|
| Document types | Training Attendance Sheet, Opening Checklist, SOP Manual and Assessment Scores |
| Candidate sources | Training System, Supervisor APP, Store Photos and Headquarters SOP Library |
| Technical baseline | FastGPT v4.17.2 |