What the documents look like
Brand-owned stores are staffed and accounted for directly by the brand, so their operating materials are not governed by a franchise contract. For this page the relevant materials are the daily sales report, the shift schedule, display photos, and the inventory transfer order. These materials are updated daily or weekly, and during a handover the store manager and the regional manager compare material source, signature state, and validity scope. The materials record sales, scheduling, and transfer facts. Retrieval and form submission collect information; they do not authorize execution.
Constraints at the upgrades step
Across an upgrade, the same material can carry different field meanings in different versions. The current version and the target version are checked first, and behavior is not inferred from an old configuration name. A hypothetical drill sample follows.
Material text one: "From 1 March 2026 to 31 March 2026, the daily sales report for East China brand-owned Store A was compiled by store manager Li and reviewed by regional manager Wang."
Material text two: "On 5 March 2026, Store A submitted an inventory transfer order. Source store: Store A. Destination store: Store B. Quantity: 20 units. Applicant: Zhang. Approval status is pending review."
Proposed handover request: "Hand over Store A operating permissions and the above materials to regional manager Wang."
The subject, object, state, and validity scope needed for judgment are present in the source text. A pending review state shows that an application was submitted; it does not show that approval was granted or that the transfer was executed. A retrieval hit on a material does not equal an authorized handover, and a collected form value does not equal completed business verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
The table covers settings documented for this deployment step or implementation checks tied to this page's materials. Values marked as hypothetical are starting points for the drill sample, with the comparison object stated.
| Configuration item | Hypothetical drill starting point | Comparison and note |
|---|---|---|
| AIPROXYAPIENDPOINT | Assume http://aiproxy:3000 | Compare against the documented root address format; no /v1 or chat interface path is appended |
| AIPROXYAPITOKEN | Assume a non-empty admin token | Compare against the AI Proxy server configuration; it does not replace an application call credential |
| FE_DOMAIN | Assume the store access address | Compare against the address clients actually use; it completes file and image resource paths |
| FILETOKENKEY | Assume a random strong key | Compare against the runtime required field; length is at least 6 characters |
| PROTOKEN and PROURL | Assume both are consistent | Compare against the pro/admin configuration; PROTOKEN is required when App sets PROURL |
| Upgrade scripts | Assume two manual trigger tasks are run | Compare against the official description; confirm old instances are stopped and old task leases expired before execution |
Three common errors
- Treating a pending transfer order as an approved transfer. Input: material text two with approval status "pending review." Comparison object: an approved or executed transfer record. Observable result: the source text does not state approval, so the approved state remains unsupported.
- Treating a retrieval hit on a material as an authorized handover. Input: the daily sales report returned by retrieval. Comparison object: a handover authorization record. Observable result: retrieval returns the material only; it does not constitute authorization.
- Carrying an old configuration name forward directly. Input: an old-version configuration field. Comparison object: the current version environment variable description. Observable result: the field correspondence must be checked against the official upgrade description; before that check the mapping is unknown.
How to verify the setup
- Input material text one. Compare the report subject, period, and reviewer against the handover request. Expected observation: when subject, period, and field agree, the material can be used for handover checking; when the reviewer is absent, record the gap.
- Input material text two. Compare the approval status field against the value "approved." Expected observation: the source states "pending review," so an approved state cannot be determined; record it as pending confirmation only.
- Input the proposed handover request. Compare the subject in the request against authorization records in the materials. Expected observation: the request names a handover recipient, the materials do not state authorization terms, and the authorization state remains unsupported.