What this category's data looks like
Kindergarten operation behavior and quality self-assessment materials include self-assessment reports, issue lists, and rectification plans. They come from daily records and periodic summaries of the kindergarten, and their update cadence advances with the self-assessment cycle and rectification milestones. The self-assessment report carries the overall judgment and conclusions; the issue list sets out items, responsible persons, and deadlines one by one; the rectification plan corresponds to measures, completion dates, and signatures. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts, and the three mutually corroborate one another. When the materials enter this function, the self-assessment report is retrieved as the main basis subject, the issue list provides item-level comparison, and the rectification plan is used to verify the version and closed-loop status. Cross-material basis queries require that answers can point back to the original text, so model integration and configuration only determine whether dialogue and retrieval can invoke the corresponding model types; they do not change the readable scope of the materials themselves.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. "Basis items that can point back to the original text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessment report | Check whether the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the fields are consistent with the issue list | Compare item by item against the original text, record the locations of discrepancies, and point back to the paragraphs |
| Issue list | Check whether the item names, quantities, and dates match the rectification plan | Cross-search by item number and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Rectification plan | Check whether completion dates, signatures, and receipts are complete | Inspect the signature and receipt fields and confirm that the version is not lagging behind |
| Model binding relationships | Check whether the model type corresponds to the step to be used, and whether the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Check the type label in the model configuration, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and confirm the configuration items where maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice are located |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names and quantities of the same record do not match between the self-assessment report and the issue list. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and item-level cross-checking has not been performed.
- Symptom: The date in the rectification plan is inconsistent with the conclusion date in the self-assessment report. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, and the old draft is still within the retrieval scope.
- Symptom: The rectification plan lacks signatures or receipts. Cause: The process nodes are not closed-loop, and the signature fields were not verified when the materials were archived.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to the corresponding steps respectively, and check the configuration items where maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice are located.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a source that can be pointed back to.
- In the model configuration, check the type label and the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
- Cross-search the self-assessment report, issue list, and rectification plan by item number, and record the locations of discrepancies in names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts.