What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the compulsory education dropout prevention and school retention scenario. The materials come from three types of daily forms: dropout risk ledgers, return-to-school persuasion records, and home visit records, and the update cadence advances in sync with each household visit, persuasion, and review. The ledger is responsible for listing student status and risk level, the persuasion records carry the process and results, and the home visit records supplement family circumstances and receipts. When these three types of materials enter multilingual materials and terminology processing, each plays a different role: the ledger provides the subject and field skeleton, the persuasion records provide the timeline and signature information, and the home visit records provide receipts and supporting evidence. Multilingual versions must correspond one-to-one with the original text, and field names, dates, quantities, and signatures must remain traceable across materials. Before materials enter the unified terminology glossary and comparison draft, they are first merged by field and then compared by language, to avoid the same record having mismatched names, quantities, or dates across two materials, or versions not being synchronized, or missing signatures and receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Dropout risk ledger | Field names, dates, quantities, and signatures remain consistent in the persuasion records and home visit records, and the original text can be traced back to | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question |
| Persuasion records | The same record's names, quantities, and dates match across the ledger and home visit records, and versions are synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check the historical message range corresponding to chatId |
| Home visit records | Receipts and signatures are complete, terminology translations can be traced back to the original text, and missing items can be located | Search for terminology wording in messages, sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout, and record the field values in variables |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same record's names, quantities, and dates do not match between the ledger and the persuasion records. Cause: the two materials are updated separately and are not merged under the same field standard, resulting in two sets of wording in the comparison draft.
- Symptom: home visit records lack signatures or receipts, and cannot serve as supporting evidence when released externally. Cause: the receipt circulation step is not synchronized, and completeness checks are not performed before materials enter terminology processing.
- Symptom: multilingual versions and original versions are not synchronized, and translations cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: the comparison draft is not regenerated after version updates, and old translations remain within the historical message range and are still referenced.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: with two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and confirm that the historical message range and answer constraints output by the memory turns configuration meet expectations.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout, and verify that translations can be traced back to the original text.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and confirm it matches the prior context range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the reference in the second question is correctly carried forward, and compare the usage records of the two runs.