What this category's data looks like
This page centers on district and county teaching research activity and classroom observation and evaluation materials, focusing on three types: teaching research activity notices, classroom observation records, and classroom evaluation minutes. Notices contain the activity name, time, location, participating kindergartens, and receipt requirements; classroom observation records contain the instructor, class, activity domain, observation points, and signature; classroom evaluation minutes contain evaluation points, improvement suggestions, and the signatures of the host and participants. Materials are mostly updated by semester or activity batch, and the same activity may appear repeatedly in notices, records, and minutes, so names, quantities, dates, and signature statuses are prone to inconsistency, and versions may also be out of sync. When entering knowledge base retrieval and recall, notices serve as the activity basis, classroom observation records serve as the process basis, and classroom evaluation minutes serve as the evaluation basis; together the three constitute the source of basis entries that can be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit truncation). The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching research activity notice | Whether the activity name, date, participating kindergartens, and receipt signature can correspond item by item with the classroom observation records and classroom evaluation minutes | In the search test, switch searchMode, search with the same activity name, and check whether the dates and quantities of notices and records in the candidate chunks are consistent |
| Classroom observation record | Whether the instructor, class, activity domain, and signature are complete, and whether the name and quantity of the same record match across the two materials | Compare the order of the first few candidates before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether the record chunks retain the key fields of the original text |
| Classroom evaluation minutes | Whether the evaluation points, improvement suggestions, and host signature are complete, and whether the version is the current one | Adjust similarity to observe changes in the number of candidate entries and scores, and confirm that the minutes chunks, notices, and records can be traced back to the same activity |
| Retrieval return | Whether the candidate chunks and similarity scores have undergone mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit truncation | Record the number of candidate entries and scores, record the reference array length separately, and check whether the tokens of the reference text are within budget |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and date of the same activity do not match between the notice and the classroom observation record. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, and cross-material field verification is not performed.
- Symptom: The version of the classroom evaluation minutes is not synchronized, and the old version and the current version are recalled at the same time. Cause: The update cadence is inconsistent, and version identifiers and replacement records are lacking.
- Symptom: The classroom observation record lacks a signature or receipt, but the candidate chunks are still cited. Cause: Retrieval only returns candidates and scores, and signature status requires manual verification by tracing back to the original text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare the number of candidate entries and scores, then toggle rerank to see the ordering of the first few entries, and check the value effects of searchMode, similarity, usingReRank, and limit.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch the retrieval mode, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and confirm that semantic and full-text results have been merged.
- Compare the order of the first few entries before and after enabling rerank, check whether the tokens of the reference text are within budget, and record the array length separately.