What this category's data looks like
In the student disciplinary actions and appeal handling category, materials include factual materials on disciplinary violations, disciplinary decision letters, and appeal letters. The sources are school archives and circulation records, and the update cadence advances with the disciplinary and appeal process. Field characteristics include student name, student ID, time of violation, description of behavior, type of disciplinary action, basis clauses, and signature and receipt dates. When entering this function, the factual materials on disciplinary violations provide the facts and chain of evidence, the disciplinary decision letter provides the conclusion and applicable clauses, and the appeal letter provides objections and supplementary facts. Together, the three types of materials support basis items that can be traced back to the original text, for replying to parents or writing into a plan.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The basis items that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by dialogue and retrieval using that model. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Factual materials on disciplinary violations | Check whether the fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the names and quantities can correspond to the disciplinary decision letter | Compare name, student ID, time of violation, description of behavior, and signature date item by item against the original text |
| Disciplinary decision letter | Check whether the basis clauses, type of disciplinary action, and effective date are the current version | Check the version number and issuance date, and confirm that the clause citations are consistent with those cited in the appeal letter |
| Appeal letter | Check whether the appeal request, supplementary facts, and receipt signature are complete | Compare the dates, names, and quantities in the appeal letter and the disciplinary decision letter, and mark inconsistencies |
| Language model and indexing model | Check whether the model type corresponds to the bound step, and whether the model identifier is consistent with the channel response | View the type labels in the model configuration, and when running dialogue and retrieval, check maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and the model identifier in the response |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name or quantity for the same disciplinary violation record does not match between the factual materials and the decision letter. Cause: The two materials were entered in different steps, and no field-level comparison was performed.
- Phenomenon: The disciplinary clauses cited in the appeal letter are inconsistent with the current version of the decision letter. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and old-version materials remain in the retrieval scope.
- Phenomenon: The disciplinary decision letter lacks a signature or the appeal letter lacks a receipt. Cause: The circulation step archived them before the signatures and receipts were fully collected.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm that maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken are consistent with the channel response.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, and see whether the answer gives a traceable source.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
- Compare the fields, dates, and signatures of the factual materials on disciplinary violations, the disciplinary decision letter, and the appeal letter one by one, and mark inconsistencies.