What this category's data looks like
This page addresses business basis queries in graduate training process management. The materials come from three types: this institution's training plans, thesis proposals, and mid-term assessment forms. Training plans contain course and credit fields, dates, and supervisor signatures; thesis proposals contain topic titles, review dates, and expert signatures; mid-term assessment forms contain assessment conclusions, grade counts, and signature fields. The three types of materials are updated in batches by semester and training stage, and the current archived version shall prevail. When entering the model access and configuration function, training plans are used to provide course and credit basis, thesis proposals are used to provide topic selection and review basis, and mid-term assessment forms are used to provide assessment conclusion and signature basis. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three must be mutually consistent, and entries must be traceable back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The basis must come from this institution's materials, the version must be current, and entries must match the original text.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Course names, credit counts, proposal dates, and supervisor signatures must match those in the thesis proposal and mid-term assessment form | In the model configuration, verify the type annotation and channel configuration, key source, compare against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether maxContext and maxTokens cover the length of material fields |
| Thesis proposal | Topic titles, review dates, and expert signatures must match those in the training plan and mid-term assessment form | Verify the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the indexing model and reranking model are bound, and during retrieval check whether quoteMaxToken is sufficient to hold the quoted text |
| Mid-term assessment form | Assessment conclusions, grade counts, and signature fields must match those in the training plan and thesis proposal | Compare against the model name returned by the channel, confirm that the language model is bound, and during conversation check whether toolChoice is set according to material retrieval needs |
| Model type | Corresponds to the step to be used; verify the type annotation in the model configuration | In the model configuration, verify the type annotation and confirm that the five categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are each bound to the corresponding step |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the training plan and the mid-term assessment form. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without field comparison, and entries cannot be traced back to the same original text.
- Symptom: The training plan version referenced by the thesis proposal has been updated, but the answer still provides basis according to the old version. Cause: Material versions were not synchronized, and the current archived version did not replace the old entries.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form lacks a signature or receipt, but the basis entry is still retrieved. Cause: The signature field was not included in verification, and materials lacking signatures were not marked as incomplete.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check whether the model identifier in the response is consistent with the name listed in the document, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice are set according to the step.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source, and whether the source comes from this institution's materials, the version is current, and entries match the original text.
- Verify the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the language, indexing, and reranking models are each bound to the conversation and retrieval steps.
- Compare against the model name returned by the channel, check that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the document, and verify whether the material fields, dates, and signatures are mutually consistent.