Context and Token Budgets for Vocational College Program Registration: Find Supporting Evidence

Vocational Programs: review context & tokens for evidence lookup. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

Filing materials for specialty setup in vocational colleges usually include a specialty setup filing form, talent demand justification, and a faculty and equipment list. The filing form records the specialty name, code, program length, enrollment scale, and signature field; the talent demand justification records industry positions, survey date, and justification conclusion; the faculty and equipment list records the number of teachers, professional titles, equipment names, and quantities. Materials are updated by academic year or application batch, and the same record appears repeatedly across multiple materials. After entering this function, the filing form takes the role of the main record, while the talent demand justification and the faculty and equipment list take the role of supporting evidence; together, the three support basis entries that can be traced back to the original text, and the field dates and signatures are the key to determining the current version.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by application settings (reply limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text" are then completed by the model, while entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Specialty setup filing formFields include specialty name, code, program length, and signature; the date must be the current versionCheck the position of the reply limit slider in application settings, and ask a cross-material question to see whether the answer traces back to the original text of the filing form
Talent demand justificationIndustry positions, survey date, and justification conclusion must match the specialty name in the filing formCheck whether the justification date and the filing form date are from the same batch, and check whether the quoted text is complete under the quoteMaxToken budget
Faculty and equipment listThe number of teachers, professional titles, equipment names, and quantities must be consistent with the filing form's criteriaCompare the names and quantities of the same record in the list and the filing form, record the number of array entries, and separately check the tokens of the quoted text
Reply limitMatches the answer length required by the page; long answers must be complete at the end and not truncatedCheck the switch and slider position in application settings, and compare usage and endings across two runs

Three common errors

  • Symptom: the same specialty name is written differently in the filing form and the talent demand justification. Cause: the two materials were filled out by different handlers, and no name unification proofreading was done.
  • Symptom: the date of the faculty and equipment list is earlier than the current version of the filing form. Cause: the list was not updated in sync with the application batch, and the version was not synchronized.
  • Symptom: the signature field or receipt of the filing form is missing. Cause: signatures and receipts were not completed during the material circulation stage, and page-by-page verification was not performed during archiving.

How to verify the setup

This function's acceptance check: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the maxResponse and maxContext settings match the answer length required by the page.

Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a traceable source.

  • Check the reply limit switch and slider position in application settings, and confirm that they match the answer length required by the page.
  • Ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the answer ending is complete, and compare the usage changes across two runs.