What this category's data looks like
The data in this category looks like this: Academic education management in technical colleges involves three core types of materials: student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records, all of which are campus materials. Student registration forms record student identity, registration date, and homeroom teacher signature; teaching plans list course names, credit hours, execution semester, and teaching and research office seal; skills training records register training items, consumable quantities, completion dates, and instructor receipts. These materials are updated by semester or academic year, and versions are synchronized with adjustments to the training program. When entering the business basis query, student registration forms are used to verify student identity and registration status, teaching plans are used to verify course setup and credit hour arrangements, and skills training records are used to verify the training process and consumable consumption. In the cited sources and traceability step, each of the three types of materials provides traceable original text fragments and source identifiers for subsequent field comparison, ledger writing, or report generation.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The 'basis entries with traceable original text' are completed next by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Whether the fields include student name, registration date, and homeroom teacher signature, and whether the date and signature are complete | Open the citation marker to compare against the original student registration form, and verify the fields and signature receipt |
| Teaching plan | Whether the course name, credit hours, and execution semester are consistent with the version sealed by the teaching and research office | Retrieve the cited fragment and compare it item by item with the original teaching plan to confirm that the version is current |
| Skills training record | Whether the training item, consumable quantity, completion date, and instructor receipt match | Use quoteList to view the cited fragment, and trace back to the original skills training record to verify the quantity and date |
| Cited content output | The number of returned entries matches the hit materials; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, see that the output is empty while the chain continues, and verify the array length and the quoteMaxToken budget separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the student registration form and the teaching plan. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The skills training record lacks the instructor signature or receipt. Cause: After training is completed, the signature was not added in time, and the signature column was not checked before archiving the materials.
- Phenomenon: The cited fragment does not match the original text. Cause: First check whether this round hit and which material was hit, then look at trimming, and do not directly attribute it to length trimming.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask a question with an original text basis, and verify whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through, and record the number of citations in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled).
Business test: Ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a traceable source.
- Open the search parameter panel and check item by item to confirm that the values are consistent with those set in the knowledge base retrieval section.
- Open the citation markers in the conversation, compare them against the source documents, and confirm item by item that the cited fragments can trace back to the original paragraphs.