What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations are issued by the organizer and include the event name, group, date, and signature field; registration forms are filled out by participating institutions and include contestant names, ID numbers, instructors, and receipt signatures; training plans are prepared by instructors and include phase objectives, class hours, and review signatures. Materials are updated according to the competition cycle, versions are locked after the registration deadline, and training plans are revised on a rolling monthly basis. When these three types of materials enter the model access and configuration stage, they serve respectively as retrieval corpus, dialogue context, and basis comparison sources: regulations provide judgment rules, registration forms provide personnel and quantity fields, and training plans provide process records. Field characteristics include date formats, name writing conventions, and signature and receipt status. When comparing across materials, it is necessary to check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent, whether versions are synchronized, and whether signatures or receipts are complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration and outputs model binding relationships and channel responses. Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types, and the type labels and the model names returned by the channel need to be checked in the model configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | The event name, group, date, and signature field must match those in the registration form and training plan, and the version must be current | Check the regulation version number and release date, compare the event name, group, and date fields in the registration form and training plan, and check whether the signature field and receipt are complete |
| Registration form | Contestant names, ID numbers, instructors, and receipt signatures must be consistent with the training plan, and quantities and dates must not conflict | Compare the contestant list, number of people, and dates in the registration form and training plan item by item, check the receipt signatures, record inconsistent entries, and trace them back to the original text location |
| Training plan | Phase objectives, class hours, and review signatures must be consistent with the regulation requirements, and the version must be synchronized with the version locked after the registration deadline | Check the training plan version against the current regulation version, compare the class hours and phase objective fields, check the review signatures, and confirm that the number of quoted entries and the tokens of the quoted text are recorded separately |
| Model configuration | The model type corresponds to the step in which it is used, the channel and key are consistent with the connected service, and the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Check the type labels in the model configuration, check the channel configuration and key source, compare the model name returned by the channel, and check the configuration items maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or date of the same event does not match in two materials. Cause: The materials were revised separately without synchronization, and the versions were not unified, causing basis entries to point to different original texts.
- Symptom: The number of contestants in the registration form and training plan is inconsistent. Cause: The roster adjustment after the registration deadline was not written back to the training plan, signatures or receipts are missing, and the record is not closed-loop.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports indexing model-related errors or authentication failures. Cause: The model type does not match the step, the channel key is inconsistent with the connected service, and the answer style changes abruptly after switching models.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to the corresponding steps respectively, check whether the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the tokens of the quoted text, and record the number of array entries separately.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source. The source must point to the specific field and date in the competition regulations, registration form, or training plan.
- In the model configuration, check the model type labels and the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the five categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are each bound to the corresponding step.
- Compare the name, quantity, and date fields in the competition regulations, registration form, and training plan item by item, check signatures and receipts, record inconsistent entries, and trace them back to the original text location.