What this category's data looks like
This page addresses business basis queries in vocational college skills competition organization. Material types include competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans, with receipts and signature pages attached. Competition regulations provide event names, groups, dates, scoring criteria, and signature fields; registration forms record contestant names, ID numbers, majors, instructors, and submission dates; training plans contain weeks, training content, venues, coach signatures, and review dates. The three types of materials are updated by edition or academic year. The same record often appears in two materials with inconsistent names, quantities, or dates, versions not synchronized, and missing signatures or receipts. When materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, each participates as an independent source in candidate fragment generation, for subsequent nodes or manual reference back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether event names, groups, dates, and signature fields match the registration forms and training plans | In the search test, switch searchMode, compare semantic and full-text candidates, and verify the event names and dates in the original regulations |
| Registration forms | Whether contestant names, quantities, majors, and instructors are consistent with the training plans, and whether submission dates and receipts are complete | Enable and disable usingReRank, compare the ranking of the top few results, and confirm that registration form candidates can be traced back to specific rows |
| Training plans | Whether weeks, training content, venues, coach signatures, and review dates are consistent with the regulations timeline | Adjust similarity to observe changes in the number of candidates and scores, separately record the number of entries in the citation array, and verify the citation text tokens |
| Receipts and signature pages | Whether signatures or receipts are missing, and whether versions are synchronized with current materials | Test once each with synonymous questions of the same question, compare candidates and scores, and confirm that receipt candidates can be traced back to the original text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same contestant name is written differently in the registration form and training plan, and the quantities do not match. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without cross-material name and quantity verification.
- Phenomenon: The competition regulations have been updated, but the registration form still references the old version's dates and groups. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and old materials remain in retrieval scope without an invalid-version marker.
- Phenomenon: The training plan lacks a coach signature or the receipt is missing, but retrieval still returns that fragment. Cause: Signatures and receipts are not included in material completeness verification, and candidates are not filtered by the current version.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank to see the ranking of the top few results; switch searchMode to see candidate sources, adjust similarity to see the number of entries and scores, and enable usingReRank to compare ranking changes.
Business test: Ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer provides a traceable source, and verify and separately record the number of entries in the citation array and the citation text tokens.
- In the knowledge base search test, retrieve once each for the same basis question using synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and scores, and switch
searchModeto compare candidate sources. - Enable and disable
usingReRankto compare the ranking of the top few results; adjustsimilarityto observe candidate changes, separately record the number of entries in the citation array, and verify the citation text tokens.