Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Undergraduate Program Establishment and Adjustment: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

What this category's data looks like

This category's data covers the drafting of materials and responsibility handover for undergraduate program setup and dynamic adjustment, involving three types of materials: program setup application forms, talent cultivation plans, and expert review opinions. The program setup application form contains fields such as program name, code, length of schooling, degree-granting category, faculty and conditions; the talent cultivation plan contains fields such as cultivation objectives, curriculum system, credits and class hours, and practical components; the expert review opinions contain the review conclusion, list of experts, signatures, and dates. The materials come from academic affairs and departmental submissions, expert review, and meeting minutes, and their update cadence advances with application batches, review rounds, and on-campus deliberation milestones. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the application form and cultivation plan serve as the main subjects to be drafted and compared, while the review opinions serve as the credentials for responsibility handover and signature receipts; the names, quantities, and dates of the three types of materials on the same record must be consistent, and versions and signatures must be traceable.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, which output the range of historical messages referenced and the answer constraints. The draftable materials and handover records are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.

Three common errors

• Symptom: The name and credit count of the same program do not match between the application form and the cultivation plan. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, without cross-checking using the same record fields.
• Symptom: The review opinions have been updated, but the application form still references the old version and old date. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version number and deliberation date were not checked during handover.
• Symptom: The handover record lacks an expert signature or receipt, but the materials are still advanced to the next stage. Cause: No missing-item blocking was set for the receipt step, and the responsible person and date were not registered.

How to verify the setup

Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first; check whether the historical range in messages and the answer constraints match.

Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

• Check the current memory turns value in the app settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second turn correctly carries forward the references from the first turn.
• Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes with the turns adjustment, and check that the program name and date registered in chatId, messages, and variables are consistent.