What this category's data looks like
Enterprise independent skill talent evaluation business basis queries typically involve three types of materials: enterprise evaluation filing forms, evaluation specifications, and candidate rosters. The filing form records the evaluation entity, occupation (trade) name, filing date, and signature/seal; the evaluation specification provides application conditions, evaluation methods, scoring and passing standards; the roster lists candidate names, identity information, application levels, and batch dates. The three types of materials are updated by batch or year, and field definitions are affected by the reporting unit. The name, quantity, and date of the same record may be inconsistent across different materials, versions may not be synchronized, and signatures or receipts may be missing. After entering the document parsing and chunking stage, the filing form and evaluation specification serve as the source of rules and basis, while the roster serves as the source of personnel and batch information. Together, the three support cross-material basis queries.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index statuses (parsed, indexing, indexed). Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Records the evaluation entity, occupation (trade) name, filing date, and signature/seal; belongs to the category verification dimension | Verify the filing form fields, dates, and signatures, and confirm consistency with the names and batches in the evaluation specification and roster |
| Evaluation specification | Provides application conditions, evaluation methods, scoring and passing standards; belongs to the category verification dimension | Verify whether the specification version is consistent with the current version, and check whether clauses can be traced back to original text paragraphs |
| Candidate roster | Lists candidate names, identity information, application levels, and batch dates; belongs to the category verification dimension | Verify the roster quantity, dates, and signature receipts, and confirm they match the filing form and evaluation specification |
| Data rows and index status | Is in one of parsed, indexing, or indexed and is consistent with the interface display | Open the data row to verify the status, and check chunking and training type in combination with chunkSize, chunkSplitter, and trainingType |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate name or application level does not match between the roster and the filing form. Cause: The two materials use different reporting definitions, and names, quantities, or dates were not cross-checked.
- Symptom: The evaluation specification cites old clauses and is inconsistent with the current filing materials. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, and updated materials were not replaced or re-entered into parsing and chunking.
- Symptom: The filing form or roster lacks signatures or receipts, and basis entries cannot be traced back to valid original text. Cause: Signature/seal completion was not done during material circulation, and the parsed content was still stored as-is.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Upload one material, observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task, and confirm the statuses are parsed, indexing, and indexed in sequence, and that the rebuild only covers data that has completed indexing.
Business test: Ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source.
- Open the data row to verify the status, confirm it is consistent with the interface display, and separately verify the identifiers of the file record and the data row.
- Check the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm it only targets data that has completed indexing, while data pending indexing does not participate in the rebuild.