What this category's data looks like
This page centers on exam organization and violation handling; the materials include exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. The exam administration manual provides the organizational process and handling criteria, the examination room record sheet carries the time, subject, invigilation, and abnormal situations of that examination room session, and the violation fact record carries the party involved, behavior description, determination, and signature. When these three types of materials enter this function, their roles differ: the exam administration manual leans toward the source of basis, the examination room record sheet leans toward the factual draft, and the violation fact record leans toward the determination and receipt. The update rhythm changes with examination batches and institutional revisions, and field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, signatures, and version numbers. When querying the basis, entries need to be traced back to specific materials and specific locations, making it easier to reply to parents or write it into a plan.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (reply limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by the model, and the entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | The version number and effective date can match the current system, and entries can be traced back to chapters and clauses | In application settings, check the position of the reply limit slider, and check whether the values of maxContext and maxResponse match the output of long entries |
| Examination room record sheet | The examination room name, subject, quantity, date, and signature are complete, and are consistent item by item with the violation fact record | Spot-check the name and quantity of the same examination room in the two materials, confirm that the date and signature have no missing items, verify tokens of the quoted text according to quoteMaxToken, and record the number of array entries separately |
| Violation fact record | The party involved, behavior description, determination conclusion, receipt signature, and version are synchronized | Compare the dates and quantities in the two materials, list separately the entries missing signatures or receipts, and confirm that the number of quoted entries is counted according to array length |
| Reply limit | Matches the answer length required by the page, and the ending of long entries is complete | Ask a basis question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is cut off in the middle of a sentence, and compare the usage changes between two runs |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and quantity of the same examination room record do not match in the two materials. Cause: The field criteria were not unified during entry, and the verification step only looked at a single material.
- Phenomenon: The version of the exam administration manual was not synchronized, and old clauses are still cited as the current basis. Cause: After revision, the version number and effective date were not updated, and the query did not verify the current status.
- Phenomenon: The violation fact record lacks a signature or receipt, and entries cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: The on-site signature process was not completed, and the signature and receipt fields were not re-verified during archiving.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the values corresponding to the three identifiers maxContext, maxResponse, and quoteMaxToken match the actual output.
Business test: ask a basis question across materials, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and confirm that the number of quoted entries is recorded according to array length and the quoted text is verified according to tokens.
- In application settings, check the position of the reply limit slider, confirm that the ending of long entry output is complete, and record the usage changes between two runs.
- Spot-check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the exam administration manual, examination room record sheet, and violation fact record, list inconsistent entries, and trace them back to the original text locations.