What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three types of materials: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. The registration form contains the candidate's name, ID number, application level, preferences, and signature; the care bonus-point materials contain the bonus item, certificate number, review date, and receipt; the admission roster contains the admission batch, major, planned number, admitted number, date, and signature of the person in charge. The three types of materials often come from different handling stages, with an update rhythm of centralized entry during the registration period, supplementary entry in batches during the review period, and consolidated finalization during the admission period. For the same candidate, the name spelling, ID number, and date in the registration form and the admission roster must be mutually referable; the bonus items and quantities in the bonus-point materials and the roster must be consistent. When the materials enter knowledge base retrieval, the registration form provides the candidate identity and preference fields, the bonus-point materials provide the review basis and receipt fields, and the admission roster provides the admission result and signature fields; together, the three support terminology comparison and full-document consistency checking.
Configuration and implementation checks
The knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test) only outputs candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming); the unified terminology table and comparison draft must be handled by subsequent nodes or manually. One retrieval consists of question optimization, semantic/full-text/hybrid recall, multi-route merging, rerank secondary sorting, similarity filtering, and reference upper-limit trimming, and only then is the reference content handed to the model obtained.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Fields include name, ID number, application level, preferences, and signature; date and signature must be complete | In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, and see whether the candidates cover the registration form fields; check the number of returned candidates and the scores, and confirm that name, ID number, and date can be traced back to the original text |
| Care bonus-point materials | Bonus item, certificate number, review date, and receipt must be mutually referable with the registration form and admission roster | Retrieve the bonus item with synonymous questions, and compare candidates and scores; look at the ranking of the first few items before and after enabling usingReRank, and confirm that the bonus item and certificate number are retained in the candidate snippets |
| Admission roster | Admission batch, major, planned number, admitted number, date, and signature of the person in charge must be consistent with the registration form and bonus-point materials | Retrieve the admission roster fields and record the number of candidates; check the tokens of the reference text after similarity filtering, record the array count separately, and confirm that the planned number and admitted number can be verified in the snippets |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name spelling, ID number, or date of the same candidate in the registration form and the admission roster do not match. Cause: the two materials are entered at different stages, versions are not synchronized, and the retrieval candidates do not hit both fields at the same time.
- Symptom: the bonus items and quantities in the care bonus-point materials and the admission roster are inconsistent. Cause: after supplementary entry in batches during the review period, the roster was not written back; reference upper-limit trimming only affects snippet length, so when the source does not match, first check hits and associations.
- Symptom: the registration form or bonus-point materials lack a signature or receipt, or the admission roster lacks the signature of the person in charge. Cause: the handling stage enters retrieval before signing is completed, and although the candidate snippets contain fields, they cannot be traced back to the complete original text.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to see the ranking of the first few items; switch searchMode and adjust similarity and limit, check the tokens of the reference text, and record the array count separately.
Business testing: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, and confirm that the translated names of the same term in the registration form, bonus-point materials, and admission roster can be traced back to the original text.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, compare the number of candidates and scores of the semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and confirm that after multi-route merging both types of results are included. - Compare the order of the first few items before and after enabling
usingReRank, and usesimilarityfiltering and reference upper-limit trimming to check the tokens and array count of the reference text, confirming that key snippets have not been trimmed away.