What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of the establishment and annual reporting of Chinese-foreign cooperatively-run schools. The materials include three types: the establishment application, the cooperation agreement, and the articles of association. The establishment application provides the institution name, education level, enrollment scale, proposed legal representative, and submission date; after entering the function, it serves as the source of basis entries for establishment. The cooperation agreement states the names of the Chinese and foreign parties, contribution method, validity period, signature page, and receipt; after entering the function, it is used to cross-check the name and date of the same record. The articles of association specify the governance structure, decision-making procedures, annual report submission responsible person, and version number; after entering the function, they are used to confirm the current version and signature completeness. The three types of materials are usually updated according to the establishment stage and the annual reporting rhythm. The same record writes enrollment quantity in the application, training scale in the agreement, and school-running scope in the articles of association. The field definitions and date formats are not unified, and the signature page and receipt page are often separate pages. After the materials enter the function, they each assume the roles of basis entries, cross-comparison, and version confirmation, and answers need to point back to specific materials and original text locations.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (reply limit, etc.), which outputs the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are then completed by the model. The reply limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | The institution name, education level, enrollment scale, proposed legal representative, submission date, and signature page are complete, and the name, quantity, and date of the same record can match those in the cooperation agreement and articles of association | In the application settings, check the reply limit switch and slider position, and take the original application text to compare item by item with the corresponding fields in the agreement and articles of association |
| Cooperation agreement | The names of the Chinese and foreign parties, contribution method, validity period, signature page, and receipt are complete, the version is the current valid version, and it is consistent with the same record in the application and articles of association | Use maxContext and maxResponse to observe the length of a single answer, then point back to the original agreement text to check the name, quantity, and date |
| Articles of association | The governance structure, decision-making procedures, annual report submission responsible person, and version number are clear, the current version has been synchronized, and signatures and receipts are not missing | Use quoteMaxToken to check the quoted content budget, and separately record the number of entries in the quoted array, then point back to the original articles of association text to confirm the version and signatures |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately without cross-checking, and field definitions and date formats are not unified.
- Phenomenon: The version of the articles of association is not synchronized, and the answer cites an old governance structure or annual report responsible person. Cause: The update rhythm is not synchronized, the current version and the archived version are mixed together, and the effective date is not marked.
- Phenomenon: The cooperation agreement lacks a signature or receipt, and the basis entries cannot point back to the complete original text. Cause: The signature page and receipt page are separate pages and are not archived, and completeness checks are missing when the materials enter the function.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, confirm that the reply limit matches the answer length required by the page, and that the answer is not cut off in the middle of a sentence.
Business test: Ask a basis question that spans materials, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and check and record maxContext, quoteMaxToken, maxResponse, and the number of entries in the quoted array separately.
- In the application settings, check the reply limit switch and slider position, compare the usage of two runs, and confirm that after adjusting the limit, the change in single-run usage matches the answer length.
- Ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and point back to the original text of the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association to confirm that the name, quantity, date, and signature receipt match.