What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the business basis query for general higher education admission and enrollment filing. The materials include the enrollment plan, filing rules, and admission roster. The enrollment plan contains institution-major groups, planned numbers, subject selection requirements, adjustment dates, and approval signatures; the filing rules contain batches, filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, effective versions, and document numbers; the admission roster contains candidate numbers, admitted majors, filing scores, admission dates, and handler signatures. The materials are updated by year and batch, and the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in two materials must be consistent. After entering this function, the enrollment plan and filing rules serve as the basis sources, and the admission roster serves as the result evidence, jointly supporting basis entries that can be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limits, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by the model, and entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | The institution-major group names, planned numbers, adjustment dates, and approval signatures can be checked in the current version | Check the switch and slider positions in application settings, confirm the values of maxResponse and maxContext, then go through the original enrollment plan and compare item by item |
| Filing rules | The batch, filing ratio, tie-breaking sorting, effective version, and document number can be matched to the original text | Check whether the quoteMaxToken budget covers the full text of the rules, separately record the number of entries in the citation array, and trace back to the rule document number and effective date |
| Admission roster | The candidate number, admitted major, filing score, admission date, and handler signature are consistent in the current version | Ask a cross-material question and see whether the answer gives traceable sources, and check whether the roster signature and receipt are complete |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The admitted major name for the same candidate does not match between the two materials. Cause: The enrollment plan and admission roster versions are not synchronized, and the old major name is still being cited.
- Phenomenon: The filing ratio in the filing rules is inconsistent with the number of records in the roster. Cause: After the rules were updated, the current version was not replaced, and the cited entry still points to the old document number.
- Phenomenon: The admission roster lacks a handler signature or receipt. Cause: The signature was not completed during the material archiving step, and the basis entry cannot trace back to the complete original text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the maxResponse and maxContext settings match the answer length.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives traceable sources, and check that the quoteMaxToken budget and the number of entries in the citation array are recorded separately.
- Check the response limit switch and slider positions in application settings, and confirm that the values of
maxResponse,maxContext, andquoteMaxTokenmatch the page requirements. - Ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the answer ending is complete, and compare the usage changes between two runs.