What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the academic journal operation cooperation management scenario, and the materials include three categories: operation cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Operation cooperation agreements record the partner name, revenue-share quantity, signing date, and signatures of both parties; advertising review forms record the advertiser, review date, handler signature, and receipt; distribution cooperation materials record the distribution channel, issue number, quantity, and handover signature. After the three material categories enter the knowledge base, each participates in recall as an independent fragment: agreement fragments carry clauses and signature fields, review form fragments carry date and receipt fields, and distribution material fragments carry quantity and channel fields. The update cadence advances by quarter or version number; old versions are retained but must be marked with their current status. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. When cross-checking materials, the current version prevails, and entries missing signatures or receipts must be marked separately.
Configuration and implementation checks
The knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test) only outputs candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming); the basis entries that can be traced back to the original text must be handled by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Operation cooperation agreement | Whether the fields, date, and signature are consistent with the current version; whether the same record's name and quantity match between the agreement and the distribution materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to compare semantic and full-text candidates; check whether the agreement signature and receipt are complete |
| Advertising review form | Whether the review date, handler signature, and receipt are complete; whether the same advertising record's date is consistent between the review form and the distribution materials | Test once each with synonymous questions, and record the number of candidate entries and scores; compare the ranking of the top few entries before and after enabling usingReRank |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Whether the distribution quantity, issue number, and handover signature are consistent with the agreement; whether the version is synchronized to the current one | Check whether the candidate fragments contain both semantic and full-text results; after filtering with similarity, see whether the key passages are retained |
| Retrieval return results | Whether the number of candidate entries and scores can be traced back to the original text; whether the cited text tokens are within budget | Record the array length separately, check the cited text tokens; after trimming with limit, confirm that key fragments are not lost |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same record's name and quantity do not match between the agreement and the distribution materials. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, without cross-material field alignment and current-version marking.
- Symptom: The review form date and the distribution material date are inconsistent. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, old-version fragments still participate in recall, and filtering by current status is not applied.
- Symptom: Entries missing signatures or receipts are still recalled. Cause: Materials are stored before signing is completed, and retrieval does not mark the completeness of signature fields.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare the number of candidate entries and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to observe the ranking of the top few entries; switch searchMode and similarity, record the array length, and separately check the cited text tokens.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer provides traceable sources, and check whether the source entries match the original text's name, quantity, date, and signature.
- In the search test, retrieve the same question once each with different phrasings, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and compare the order of the top few entries before and after enabling
usingReRank. - For cross-material basis questions, check entry by entry whether the candidate fragments can be traced back to the original text, and check whether the current version, signature, and receipt are complete.