What this category's data looks like
This page addresses self-funded study abroad application services, with materials drawn from three types: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The contract is signed by the service provider and the applicant and then archived, containing service items, fee terms, signatures of both parties, and the signing date; the school application form is filled out by the applicant school by school, containing institution name, field of study, application round, deadline, and submission receipt; the personal statement is written by the applicant and reviewed by the service provider, containing version number, revision date, and signature confirmation. In terms of update cadence, the contract is updated at signing and upon changes, the application form is added to or removed from as the school list progresses, and the personal statement is revised repeatedly by round. When entering workflow orchestration, the three respectively take on the roles of basis, target, and material: the contract defines the service boundary, the application form defines the branch destination, and the personal statement defines the version baseline. Field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. The same record often has mismatched names or dates across two materials, versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch direction and interaction state records. "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | Check whether the contract name, number of service items, signing date, and signatures of both parties are complete, and whether they are consistent with the records in the application form and personal statement | Verify the contract fields one by one, compare the same record's name, quantity, and date in the application form and personal statement, and check signatures and receipts |
| School application form | Check whether the institution name, field of study, application round, deadline, and submission receipt are consistent with the contract's service scope | Verify the application form fields school by school, check whether the receipt is retained, and compare the dates and names in the contract and personal statement |
| Personal statement | Check whether the version number, revision date, and signature confirmation are synchronized with the application form round, and whether they are consistent with the contract record name | Verify the personal statement fields version by version, check signatures and receipts, and compare the same record in the application form and contract |
| User selection node | Check that each option corresponds to one branch connection, the interaction state is recorded, and the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | In the node, verify the options and branch connections one by one, trigger it once to view the node status in the run records, reference variables in a subsequent node and run a trial, and use nodeId to locate the node record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: after selecting an option, the default branch is still taken. Cause: the options and branch connections were not verified one by one, or the selection result variable was not referenced in a subsequent node.
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: the two materials were updated separately without cross-checking.
- Symptom: the personal statement version is not synchronized, and the signature or receipt is missing. Cause: after revision, the version number and date were not written back, and the signature and receipt steps were skipped.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, that nodeId can be used to locate the node record, and check whether the variables reference takes effect.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover list, see which record is missing, and focus on checking whether the name, quantity, date, and signature of the contract, application form, and personal statement are consistent.
- In the node, verify the options and branch connections one by one, trigger an interaction once, and view the node status and branch direction in the run records.
- Reference
variablesin a subsequent node and run a trial once, comparing the same record's name, quantity, date, and signature in the contract, application form, and personal statement.