What this category's data looks like
District and county teaching research activities and classroom observation and evaluation involve three types of materials: teaching research activity notices, classroom observation records, and classroom evaluation minutes. Notices are issued by the teaching research office on a weekly basis or by activity batch, with fields including activity name, subject, grade, time, location, presenter, participants, and signature column; classroom observation records are filled in on site by the observer, with fields including instructor, class, topic, period, observation points, signature, and receipt; classroom evaluation minutes are compiled by the teaching research group leader, with fields including evaluation target, issue items, improvement suggestions, date, and signature. When the three types of materials enter the parsing and chunking stage, notices serve as the activity baseline information source, classroom observation records serve as the on-site factual source, and classroom evaluation minutes serve as the conclusion and rectification source. After parsing and chunking, each is stored as a visible data row for retrieval and subsequent processing to compare names, quantities, dates, and signatures by the same object. The update cadence is synchronized with activity batches, with common parallel versions and delayed receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the parsing and training task (server-side task), outputting data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). The discrepancy list is then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is completed, parsing and chunking immediately store visible data rows and bind a unique data identifier; the index transitions through the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed, and data pending indexing does not participate in recall.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching research activity notice | The activity name, subject, grade, time, location, presenter, and notice date must be consistent with the ledger, and the signature column and receipt must be complete | Open the data row to check the parsed, indexing, and indexed statuses, compare the notice fields with the same-named record in the ledger, and record missing signature or receipt items |
| Classroom observation record | The instructor, class, topic, period, and observation date must be consistent with the corresponding notice record, and the quantity must match the number of participants | Check the file record and the data row separately, inspect whether chunking under the chunkSize and chunkSplitter settings cuts off fields, and mark discrepancies in name, quantity, and date |
| Classroom evaluation minutes | The evaluation target, issue items, improvement suggestions, minutes date, and signature must be aligned across the classroom observation record and the notice | Check whether the data rows covered by the rebuild task contain only completed indexed data, verify the processing mode corresponding to trainingType, and record items whose versions are not synchronized |
| File record and data row | The identities of the file record and the data row are distinguished separately, and the same material is not mixed into one entry | Check the file record and data row identifiers separately, confirm that initial training covers data pending indexing and that rebuild targets only completed indexed data |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same teaching research activity do not match across two materials. Cause: The notice and classroom observation record are filled in independently and are not aligned by the same object identifier, so data rows are scattered after parsing.
- Symptom: The version of the classroom evaluation minutes is not synchronized, and the old and new versions exist at the same time. Cause: After the material is updated, it is not re-stored, the retrieval layer still recalls the old data row, and the index status does not transition with the version.
- Symptom: The notice lacks a signature or receipt, and the classroom observation record has no signature. Cause: The materials are imported as scanned copies or tables, the signature column is not parsed as a verifiable field, and the reviewer cannot confirm it on the data row.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: upload one material, observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task, confirm that the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed are consistent with the interface display, and that rebuild covers only completed indexed data.
Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, verify the name, quantity, date, and signature of that record in the notice, classroom observation record, and classroom evaluation minutes, form a discrepancy list for the reviewer to confirm and write back.
- Open the data row to check the status, confirm that the file record and data row identifiers are distinguished separately, and separately record discrepancies in the name, quantity, date, and signature of the same object in the two materials.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, confirm that it covers only completed indexed data, that initial training covers data pending indexing, and submit the discrepancy list to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back to the ledger.