What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three types of materials: program setup application forms, talent cultivation plans, and expert review opinions. The application form is filled in by the school, containing the program name, code, planned enrollment number, study duration, and signature date; the cultivation plan is reviewed and approved by the teaching committee, containing course modules, credits and class hours, practical proportion, and version number; the review opinions are issued by external experts, containing review conclusions, expert signatures, and receipt dates. Materials are submitted centrally by academic year and updated in sync when program directions are adjusted or the curriculum system is revised. The field characteristics are four types: name, quantity, date, and signature. When entering this function, the application form serves as the main record anchor, the cultivation plan provides course and credit context, and the review opinions supplement conclusions and signature status. Together, the three form the comparison draft for discrepancy localization.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which outputs the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The discrepancy list is then completed by the model. The response limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup application form | Name, quantity, date, and signature must match the ledger item by item | Retrieve the application form and ledger, verify the program name, planned enrollment number, and signature date, and record discrepancy fields |
| Talent cultivation plan | Course modules, credits and class hours, and version number must be from the same source as the application form | Compare the program name, total credits, and version number in the cultivation plan and the application form, and mark items not synchronized |
| Expert review opinions | Review conclusions, expert signatures, and receipt dates must be complete and traceable | Check the conclusion wording, signatures, and receipt dates in the review opinions, and mark records missing signatures or receipts |
| Response limit | Matches the answer length required by the page | In application settings, check the switch and slider position, and confirm that maxResponse matches the expected length |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The planned enrollment number for the same program does not match between the application form and the cultivation plan. Cause: The two materials are not synchronized in version, and one party did not write back to the ledger after revision.
- Symptom: The review opinions are missing expert signatures or receipt dates. Cause: After paper signing, they were not scanned and archived, and were missed during electronic circulation.
- Symptom: The program name appears in one material as the full name and in another as the abbreviation. Cause: The reporting standard is not unified, and the name field was not verified against the ledger's standard value.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the ending is complete, and confirm that maxResponse works with maxContext and quoteMaxToken without truncation; the number of citations is recorded separately by array length, and the tokens of the cited text are verified separately.
Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, submit them to the reviewer for confirmation, and write them back.
- Compare the name, quantity, date, and signature of the application form, cultivation plan, and review opinions one by one, and write inconsistent fields into the discrepancy list
- After confirming each item in the discrepancy list one by one, write back to the ledger, and return records missing signatures or receipts for correction