What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on vocational college program setup filing materials, covering three categories: program setup filing forms, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment lists. Filing forms come from institutional applications and are updated monthly by batch, with fields including program name, program length, planned enrollment number, date, and signature; talent demand justification comes from industry research and is updated with industry reports, with fields including job title, demand quantity, and research date; faculty and equipment lists come from on-campus assets and are updated by semester, with fields including teacher name, professional title, equipment name, quantity, and purchase date. When entering the tool calling stage, the filing form serves as the primary record, while the justification and lists serve as comparison sources; the fields, dates, and signatures of the three must be aligned item by item.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Check whether the program name, program length, planned enrollment number, date, and signature are consistent with the ledger | Open the filing form and compare field by field, marking rows where the name, quantity, or date does not match |
| Talent demand justification | Check whether the job title, demand quantity, research date, and signature correspond to the filing form | Retrieve the original justification text, verify the name and quantity of the same record, and check whether the date is synchronized |
| Faculty and equipment list | Check teacher name, professional title, equipment name, quantity, purchase date, and signature | Compare the list with the filing form item by item, locating entries missing signatures or receipts |
| Tool calling node | Check whether the tool description, parameter description, and whether it is required correspond to the material fields | Run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, and inspect the input parameters and return in the call record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across two materials. Cause: The filing form and justification form are updated separately, without field-level comparison.
- Symptom: Versions are not synchronized, and an old list is mixed into this comparison. Cause: Materials are not locked by batch, and the tool call read historical files.
- Symptom: Signatures or receipts are missing, and the discrepancy list cannot be closed. Cause: Signature documents were not fully collected during material circulation, and receipts were not archived.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, inspect the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check whether the toolChoice, functionCall, and tool description fields can be understood independently.
Business test: Use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, record the name, quantity, and date discrepancies, submit them to the reviewer for confirmation, and write them back.
- Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the description and whether it is required, and confirm that they correspond to the business material fields.
- On the canvas, check the diamond connectors and node status, and confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool.