What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of school safety hazard inspections and campus incident reporting. The materials include safety inspection checklists, hazard rectification ledgers, and emergency incident reports. Safety inspection checklists are filled in weekly or per inspection, with fields including inspection date, inspector, hazard location, hazard description, and rectification deadline; hazard rectification ledgers are registered item by item by hazard number, with fields including rectification responsible person, rectification measures, completion date, and reviewer signature; emergency incident reports are documented separately by incident occurrence time, with fields including incident process, handling measures, reporter, and receipt acknowledgment. After these three types of materials enter this function, the safety inspection checklists and hazard rectification ledgers assume the role of progress records, and the emergency incident reports assume the role of exception records. The statistical scope description fixes the correspondence between record counts and statistical counts in the form of a header, and the update rhythm is weekly aggregation and monthly reconciliation.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the connection configuration of the deployment environment (server side), not by the capability of a model node, and outputs whether the connection is available (service startup result and connection logs). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by the deployment handover and subsequent business processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Safety inspection checklist | The inspection date, inspector, hazard location, and rectification deadline fields are complete, and correspond item by item with the ledger | In the deployment environment, check whether the dates and quantities of the fields in this table and the ledger fields are consistent, and confirm that the signature column has been filled in |
| Hazard rectification ledger | The rectification responsible person, completion date, and reviewer signature are traceable, and the name and quantity of the same hazard are consistent in the two materials | Check the hazard number and quantity against the safety inspection checklist, and confirm that the version is the latest and the receipt is complete |
| Emergency incident report | The incident occurrence time, reporter, and receipt acknowledgment fields are complete, and are consistent with the weekly record total scope | Use one week of records to check the total, and see whether exception incidents are listed separately and the scope is clearly stated |
| Main business database, log database, cache, and vector database connection variables | The main business database, log database, cache, and vector database can point to different instances respectively; when the log database is left blank, the main database is reused | Check item by item that the values of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL are consistent with the database addresses, and view the connection results in the startup logs |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same hazard do not match between the safety inspection checklist and the rectification ledger. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately and are not merged under a unified number.
- Symptom: The dates of the emergency incident report and the weekly report total do not match. Cause: The incident occurrence time and the reporting time are mixed up, and the scope is not written in the header.
- Symptom: The rectification ledger lacks the reviewer signature or receipt. Cause: The version is not synchronized, and the review step is not backfilled before archiving.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: connect once item by item to the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database, check the connection results in the startup logs, and confirm that the values of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL are consistent with the database addresses.
Business test: use one week of records to check the total, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated.
- In the deployment environment, check that the values of the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database connection variables are consistent with the database addresses, and view the service startup result and connection logs.
- Use one week of records to check the total of the record counts and statistical counts of the safety inspection checklist, hazard rectification ledger, and emergency incident report, and confirm that the scope is written in the header and exceptions are listed separately.