What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on modern apprenticeship and order class management; materials include school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and mentor apprenticeship records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements are signed by both cooperating parties and updated by academic year or project cycle; order class training plans are compiled by the teaching department and synchronized with course and position adjustments; mentor apprenticeship records are filled in weekly or monthly by the mentoring mentor, including date, signature, and receipt. When these materials enter this feature, the school-enterprise cooperation agreement serves as the baseline ledger, the order class training plan serves as the training basis, and the mentor apprenticeship records serve as process evidence. Field characteristics center on name, quantity, date, and signature; the same record must be aligned item by item across the three materials. Material versions and receipt status are common sources of discrepancies; when update rhythms are inconsistent, discrepancy localization relies on the tool calling node to read and compare fields.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter description, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether name, quantity, date, and signature are consistent with the order class training plan | Open the agreement and training plan, verify item by item the name, quantity, and date of the same record, and check the signature field and receipt |
| Order class training plan | Whether the version is synchronized with the mentor apprenticeship records, and whether date and signature are complete | Compare the plan version number with the version referenced in the apprenticeship records, and verify the date range and signature field |
| Mentor apprenticeship record | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match the ledger | Extract one apprenticeship record, compare field by field with the ledger, and mark missing signature or missing receipt locations |
| Tool calling node | Whether the tool description, parameter description, and whether required correspond to the material fields | On the canvas, verify the diamond connectors and node status, and use toolChoice and functionCall to check the input parameters and return |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the agreement and the apprenticeship record. Cause: The two materials have different update rhythms and were not synchronized according to the same field definition.
- Symptom: The order class training plan version is not synchronized, and the apprenticeship record references an old version. Cause: After the version change, write-back was not triggered, and the tool call result still points to old-version fields.
- Symptom: The mentor apprenticeship record lacks a signature or receipt, and the discrepancy list cannot be confirmed. Cause: When the materials entered the feature, the signature field was not validated, and the model directly called the tool according to the description.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; check the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the record.
Business test: Use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, and mark name, quantity, date, or signature discrepancies.
- Open the tool node description field, confirm the description is understandable on its own, and verify the parameter description and whether required items.
- Run a trial with a question missing that field, and observe whether it asks a follow-up question first rather than directly fabricating parameter values.