What this category's data looks like
The materials on this page come from the journal three-review three-proof and editorial quality process, including three-review forms, proofs, proofreading records, and version receipts. Three-review forms record the fields, dates, and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review; proofs carry the typeset text and images, proofreading records register each proofreading round, the number of changes, and the responsible person's signature; receipts are used to confirm version synchronization and handover. Materials are updated by shift or version node, and the field characteristic is that multiple materials cross-reference the same record. When entering the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records are imported as auxiliary data to support retrieval candidates; deployment status and operation records are produced by the retrieval node and search test outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores, and are then handed to subsequent nodes or manual organization.
Configuration and implementation checks
The knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test) only outputs candidate snippets and similarity scores (after mode, merging, reranking, filtering, and upper-limit trimming); the handover-ready deployment status and operation records must be completed by subsequent nodes or manually. Retrieval first undergoes question optimization, then semantic, full-text, or hybrid recall, multi-path merging followed by reranking for secondary sorting, and finally similarity filtering and citation upper-limit trimming to obtain the citation content handed to the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | The fields, dates, and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review are complete, and match the same record's name, quantity, and date in the proofs and proofreading records | In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, and hybrid once each, compare candidate snippets and similarity scores, and check whether the three-review form fields are recalled |
| Proof | When the text and image fields in the proof reference the same record as the proofreading records and three-review form, the name, quantity, and date match, and the version is not misaligned | Turn reranking on and off, compare the order of the first few candidates, and check whether key passages of the proof are retained; record the number of candidates and scores, and do not compare array length with citation budget for equality |
| Proofreading record | Each proofreading round, number of changes, responsible person's signature, and receipt are complete, and match the dates and quantities in the three-review form and proof | Check item by item according to the handover form and see which record is missing; check the citation text tokens and number of candidates returned under the usingReRank, similarity, and limit settings and register them separately |
| Deployment status and operation records | Version, connection, and task records are consistent, and every item on the handover form has a corresponding record | In the search test, test once each with synonymous questions and compare candidates and scores; check whether searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit are consistent with the operation records |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the three-review form and the proof. Cause: When importing auxiliary data, it was not aligned to the same version node, and field mapping was misaligned.
- Symptom: The proofreading record lacks a signature or receipt, and no corresponding item can be found on the handover form. Cause: The version was not synchronized, changes from the previous shift were not written back, and the next shift took over directly.
- Symptom: The same question cannot be recalled when phrased differently, or there are many candidates but the ones ranked first are all irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, reranking is not enabled, or similarity filtering and citation upper-limit trimming are inappropriate.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidate snippets and similarity scores, then turn reranking on and off to see the order of the first few items; record the number of candidates and scores, register the number of citations separately by array length, and check citation text tokens separately.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the three-review form, proof, and proofreading record are consistent.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeto semantic, full-text, and hybrid, record the number of candidates and similarity scores respectively, and check whether both semantic and full-text results are included. - Turn reranking on and off and compare the order of the first few candidates; check whether
usingReRank,similarity, andlimitare consistent with the operation records, and check that citation text tokens and array count are registered separately.