What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three types of materials: student registration records, teaching plans, and skills training records. Student registration records come from the admissions and registration system and are updated at semester registration points; fields include student name, major name, registration date, and homeroom teacher signature. Teaching plans come from academic scheduling and are revised by academic year or semester; fields include course name, number of class hours, course start date, and teaching and research office review signature. Skills training records come from training workshops and are registered weekly or by task batch; fields include training item name, completed quantity, training date, and instructor and workshop receipt. When materials enter the tool call and plugin stage, student registration records provide the identity and registration baseline, teaching plans provide the course and class-hour baseline, and skills training records provide the training execution and signature receipt baseline; together the three support comparison of the same object's name, quantity, and date across two materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the tool call node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The model judges whether to call the tool this time based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, it may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Tool description | Whether the description can independently explain the purpose, when it should be used, and what result it returns | Open the tool node description field, read that description on its own, check whether it states the purpose, trigger timing, and return result, and check whether toolChoice reflects the basis for the choice in the call record |
| Parameter description | Each parameter states its meaning and value, and corresponds to fields in the student registration records, teaching plans, and skills training records | Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the description and whether it is required, and confirm that the parameter meaning points to fields that actually exist in the materials, such as name, quantity, date, and signature |
| Whether required | Required parameters correspond to fields that actually exist in the business materials, and when that field is missing, whether the model asks first | Run a test with a question that lacks that field, see whether the call record shows it asks first or directly fabricates parameter values, and check whether the inputs returned by functionCall come from the materials |
| Tool call node connections | The diamond interface is connected to the target tool, and the node status matches the canvas connections | Check the diamond connections and node status on the canvas, confirm that after multiple tools are chained the results do not cross over into each other, and that the inputs and returns in the call record can be matched one by one |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same student's name or quantity does not match between the student registration record and the skills training record. Cause: the two materials are entered by different nodes or manually, lacking field-level comparison keyed on the same object.
- Symptom: the teaching plan has been revised, but the skills training record is still registered according to the old version, and the dates and class-hour quantities are inconsistent. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and the tool call node does not read the latest material version.
- Symptom: the skills training record lacks the instructor signature or workshop receipt, and the student registration record lacks the homeroom teacher signature. Cause: the material circulation step does not verify the signature and receipt fields, and there are no corresponding parameters in the call record.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a test with a question that lacks a required parameter, check the inputs and returns in the call record, confirm whether it asks first or calls according to the description, and check the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the record.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, and check item by item the name, quantity, date, and signature in the student registration records, teaching plans, and skills training records.
- Open the tool node description field, read that description on its own, check whether it states the purpose, trigger timing, and return result, and confirm that the parameter description and whether-required items correspond to material fields.
- Check the diamond connections and node status on the canvas, run a test with a question that lacks a required field, and check whether the call record shows it asks first or directly fabricates parameter values.