What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the exam organization and disciplinary handling category. The source materials are exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and disciplinary fact records. The update cadence follows exam batches and examination district notices. The field characteristics center on candidate name, examination room number, disciplinary item, date, and signature field. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, each plays a different role: the exam administration manual provides the rule basis and process wording, the examination room record sheet provides the original on-site record, and the disciplinary fact record provides the exception items pending review. Exception tracing depends on the referential relationships of these materials in the dialogue history, and manual review conclusions need to be traceable back to specific materials and fields.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | The name, date, and signature field must be consistent with the examination room record sheet | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, confirm that rule items can be referred to by the prior context; check whether the rule section in messages falls within the reference turns |
| Examination room record sheet | The name, quantity, and date of the same record must not fail to match the disciplinary fact record | Run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions. The first question refers to a certain examination room record, and the second question uses a reference to follow up on that record; check the historical range corresponding to chatId |
| Disciplinary fact record | If the signature or receipt is missing, it must not directly enter the review conclusion | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns; check whether variables carries the reviewer signature field |
| Exception list and review conclusion | The exception has original record support and the reviewer signature is complete | Create an exception record and see whether it can be traced to the source material; check that the name, quantity, and date in the conclusion correspond item by item with the original record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question. Cause: The memory turns are too small, the referent in the prior context does not enter the reference range, and the answer loses continuity.
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record fail to match between the examination room record sheet and the disciplinary fact record. Cause: The two material versions are not synchronized, and field-by-field comparison was not performed during review.
- Symptom: The review conclusion lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The disciplinary fact record does not include a signature field, and the process did not intercept before conclusion generation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question; check whether the historical range corresponding to messages and chatId falls within the memory turns.
Business test: Create an exception record and see whether it can be traced to the source material; check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the exam administration manual, examination room record sheet, and disciplinary fact record are consistent.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the prior context range required by the question; after adjustment, compare the usage records of two runs.
- Run a trial with two consecutive question sentences and confirm that the second round can correctly carry forward the reference from the first round; check that the opening message is not treated as prior context.