What this category's data looks like
This page addresses exam organization and violation handling scenarios. Materials come from exam administration manuals, examination room records, and violation fact records. The update cadence follows exam batches and exam administration processes. Field characteristics include candidate name, subject name, violation count, occurrence date, invigilator signature, and receipt status. The exam administration manual provides rule basis and field definitions, the examination room record provides on-site logs and timeline, and the violation fact record provides qualitative descriptions and handling opinions. When these three types of materials enter the material verification and discrepancy localization function, each plays a different role: the exam administration manual serves as the field baseline, the examination room record serves as process evidence, and the violation fact record serves as the conclusion carrier. The system needs to establish correspondence among records of the same candidate, same subject, and same date across the three materials, identify discrepancies in name, count, date, signature, and receipt, form a discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back. After materials enter the function, they are first grouped by batch and examination room, then compared field by field, and finally reviewable discrepancy entries are output.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The "discrepancy list" is then completed by the model. The response limit is controlled by a slider for the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | Item-by-item consistency with the name, count, date, and signature fields of the examination room record and violation fact record | In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, confirm that the single-answer length can cover the field list of the three materials, and record the output range of maxResponse and maxContext |
| Examination room record | Consistency with the subject name, violation count, and occurrence date of the exam administration manual, with no missing invigilator signature | Compare the name and count for the same candidate and same subject item by item, mark rows where dates do not match, check whether the signature column and receipt column are empty, and record the quoted text budget corresponding to quoteMaxToken |
| Violation fact record | Consistency with the qualitative clauses of the exam administration manual and the timeline of the examination room record, with the version synchronized | Check the version number and receipt status, locate fields where the name, count, and date of the same record do not match across the two materials, form a discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The subject name or violation count of the same candidate does not match across two materials. Cause: Entry was not synchronized according to the field baseline of the exam administration manual, resulting in name and count conflicts in the discrepancy list.
- Phenomenon: The dates of the examination room record and the violation fact record are inconsistent. Cause: The version was not synchronized, the old material was not updated with the batch, and the date field remained in the previous round of the exam administration process.
- Phenomenon: The violation fact record lacks an invigilator signature or receipt. Cause: The material circulation step did not complete sign-off, the signature column and receipt column are empty, and the reviewer cannot confirm that the handling opinion has been delivered.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the ending is complete, confirm that the response limit and truncation behavior match the answer length required by the page, and check the actual output range of maxResponse and maxContext.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, compare name, count, date, and signature item by item, output a discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, record the output ranges corresponding to the three identifiers
maxContext,quoteMaxToken, andmaxResponse; the business deliverable is completed subsequently. - Use a real record for discrepancy localization, compare the name, count, date, and signature of the exam administration manual, examination room record, and violation fact record field by field, write inconsistent entries into the discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.