What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials usually include three types: the program setup filing form, the talent demand justification, and the faculty and equipment list. The filing form records the program name, code, program length, enrollment scale, and signatures and seals; the talent demand justification contains the survey date, industry positions, and quantity forecasts; the faculty and equipment list sets out teacher titles and equipment names, specifications, and quantities. The materials are filled in by the institution and accepted by the competent authority, and are updated by academic year or batch. The same record often shows inconsistencies in names, quantities, and dates across multiple materials, with versions not synchronized or signature receipts missing. When entering acceptance Q&A, the filing form serves as the main record to locate the program entry, the talent demand justification is used to verify the basis for offering the program, and the faculty and equipment list supports condition review; together the three form the comparison draft for missing-item follow-up questions, and any blank or contradictory field may trigger a follow-up question.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The acceptance record and the supplementary question items are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Whether the name, code, date, and signature are consistent with the talent demand justification | Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second round can carry on the references from the first round |
| Talent demand justification | Whether the survey date and number of positions match the filing form and the faculty and equipment list | Compare the usage records of two runs and observe changes in run consumption after adjusting the turns |
| Faculty and equipment list | Whether the number of teachers and equipment specifications are synchronized with the fields in the filing form and no signature receipt is missing | Run a trial with two consecutive questions to confirm that the opening message is not treated as preceding text |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts | Whether consecutive follow-up questions can correctly carry on references and whether answers are based on materials | Check the memory turns in the application settings and check whether the prompt constraints are written into the answer scope |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same program does not match between the filing form and the talent demand justification. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately and versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: The faculty and equipment list lacks a signature or receipt, and the acceptance record cannot be closed. Cause: Each item was not verified one by one during material circulation.
- Symptom: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, or the answer becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The value of memory turns does not match the range of preceding text required by the question.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries on the references from the first question; check the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints, and confirm the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables in the acceptance chain.
Business test: ask a question that lacks key information and see whether it first asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings and match it with the range of preceding text required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, compare the usage records of the two runs, and confirm that run consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.